Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751852›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Ultrasound-Guided Subfascial Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections Versus Enthesis Needling for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Leire Atilano, Nerea Martin, Jose Ignacio Martin, Gotzon Iglesias, Josu Mendiola, Paola Bully, Ayoola Aiyegbusi, Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Palomo, Isabel Andia

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04231357 (Great Trochanteric Pain Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04231357 phase3completednot on this map

Great Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Parallel Group, Blind Randomised Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PRP Injection Versus Needle Tenotomy With Lidocaine

TypeinterventionalSponsorIsabel AndiaRan2019 to 2023Enrolled81ConditionsTendinopathyArmsplatelet rich plasma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leire AtilanoRegenerative Therapies, Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Nerea MartinRegenerative Therapies, Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Jose Ignacio MartinRegenerative Therapies, Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Gotzon IglesiasRegenerative Therapies, Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Josu MendiolaRegenerative Therapies, Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Paola BullyMethodological and Statistical Consulting, Sopuerta, Bizkaia, Spain.
Ayoola AiyegbusiDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Clinical Sciences College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
Jose Manuel Rodriguez-PalomoRegenerative Therapies, Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Isabel AndiaRegenerative Therapies, Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is characterized by gluteal enthesopathy involving the peritrochanteric space and associated with chronic pain and functional impairment. A corticosteroid injection in the trochanteric bursa is the usual palliative treatment for pain. However, it is important to investigate treatment options that will relieve pain in the peritrochanteric space. Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy of subfascial platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection and enthesis needling for GTPS. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 92 patients (90% women; mean age, 55 years old; mean body mass index, 25.3 kg/m Results: Baseline demographic and radiological characteristics were similar between the groups. The PRP group saw significantly greater improvement from baseline to 12 months posttreatment on the HOS-SS subscore compared with the needling group (32.09 [95% CI, 28.99-40.20] vs 20.52 [95% CI, 11.99-29.05]; Conclusion: Both subfascial PRP injection and enthesis needling resulted in clinical improvements, but the improvement in the HOS-SS was greater in the PRP group. Registration: NCT04231357 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Indexed as

enthesis needlingfasciagluteal tendonsgreater trochanteric pain syndromeplatelet-rich plasmaultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38751852
PMCPMC11095191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.