ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2024
Imperfect refractive index matching in scanning laser optical tomography and a method for digital correction.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embedded Printing of Integrated Quantum Dot Waveguide Deformation Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Imperfect refractive index matching in scanning laser optical tomography and a method for digital correction.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Scanning laser optical tomography (SLOT) is a volumetric multi-modal imaging technique that is comparable to optical projection tomography and computer tomography. Image quality is crucially dependent on matching the refractive indexes (RIs) of the sample and surrounding medium, but RI matching often requires some effort and is never perfect. Aim: Reducing the burden of RI matching between the immersion medium and sample in biomedical imaging is a challenging and interesting task. We aim at implementing a post processing strategy for correcting SLOT measurements that have errors caused by RI mismatch. Approach: To better understand the problems with poorly matched Ris, simulated SLOT measurements with imperfect RI matching of the sample and medium are performed and presented here. A method to correct distorted measurements was developed and is presented and evaluated. This method is then applied to a sample containing fluorescent polystyrene beads and a sample made of olydimethylsiloxane with embedded fluorescent nanoparticles. Results: From the simulations, it is evident that measurements with an RI mismatch larger than 0.02 and no correction yield considerably worse results compared to perfectly matched measurements. RI mismatches larger than 0.05 make it almost impossible to resolve finer details and structures. By contrast, the simulations imply that a measurement with an RI mismatch of up to 0.1 can still yield reasonable results if the presented correction method is applied. The experiments validate the simulated results for an RI mismatch of about 0.09. Conclusions: The method significantly improves the SLOT image quality for samples with imperfectly matched Ris. Although the absolutely best imaging quality will be achieved with perfect RI matching, these results pave the way for imaging in SLOT with RI mismatches while maintaining high image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.