ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Conditional survival of patients with primary bone lymphoma of the spine: how survival changes after initial diagnosis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-driven conditional survival prediction model for atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Personalized survival prediction in pediatric glioblastoma using a machine learning-powered web tool.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Designing a web-based platform for dynamic estimation of individualized conditional survival in grade 3 gliomas.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current survival prediction methodologies for primary bone lymphoma (PBL) of the spine are deficient. This study represents the inaugural utilization of conditional survival (CS) to assess the outcome of this disease. Moreover, our objective was to devise a CS-based nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in real-time for spinal PBL. Methods: Patients with PBL of the spine diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The OS was determined through the Kaplan-Meier method. The CS characteristic of patients with spinal PBL was delineated, with the CS being estimated utilizing the formula: CS(α|β) = OS(α+β)/OS(β). CS(α|β) denotes the probability of additional α-year survivorship, assuming the patient has already survived β years after the time of observation. Three methods including univariate Cox regression, best subset regression (BSR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were used to identify predictors for CS-based nomogram construction. Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis was executed to determine the OS rate for these patients, revealing a survival rate of 68% and subsequently 63% at the 3-year and 5-year mark respectively. We then investigated the CS patterning exhibited by these patients and discovered the survival of PBL in the spine progressively improved with time. Meanwhile, through three different prognostic factor selection methods, we identified the best predicter subset including age, tumor histology, tumor stage, chemotherapy and marital status, for survival prediction model construction. Finally, we successfully established and validated a novel CS-based nomogram model for real-time and dynamic survival estimation. Moreover, we further designed a risk stratification system to facilitate the identification of high-risk patients. Conclusions: This is the first study to analyze the CS pattern of PBL of the spine. And we have also developed a CS-based nomogram that provide dynamic prognostic data in real-time, thereby aiding in the formulation of personalized treatment strategies in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.