Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751735›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024

Adherence to dietary recommendations by socioeconomic status in the United Kingdom biobank cohort study.

Fernanda Carrasco-Marín, Solange Parra-Soto, Jirapitcha Bonpoor, Nathan Phillips, Atefeh Talebi, Fanny Petermann-Rocha, Jill Pell, Frederick Ho, Nicolás Martínez-Maturana, Carlos Celis-Morales and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fernanda Carrasco-MarínDepartamento de Enfermería, Farmacología y Fisioterapia, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Solange Parra-SotoSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Jirapitcha BonpoorSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Nathan PhillipsSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Atefeh TalebiSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Fanny Petermann-RochaCentro de Investigación Biomédica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile.
Jill PellSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Frederick HoSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Nicolás Martínez-MaturanaDepartamento de Ciencias Preclínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Carlos Celis-MoralesSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Rafael Molina-LuqueDepartamento de Enfermería, Farmacología y Fisioterapia, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Guillermo Molina-RecioDepartamento de Enfermería, Farmacología y Fisioterapia, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding how socioeconomic markers interact could inform future policies aimed at increasing adherence to a healthy diet. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 437,860 participants from the UK Biobank. Dietary intake was self-reported. Were used as measures socioeconomic education level, income and Townsend deprivation index. A healthy diet score was defined using current dietary recommendations for nine food items and one point was assigned for meeting the recommendation for each. Good adherence to a healthy diet was defined as the top 75th percentile, while poor adherence was defined as the lowest 25th percentile. Poisson regression was used to investigate adherence to dietary recommendations. Results: There were significant trends whereby diet scores tended to be less healthy as deprivation markers increased. The diet score trends were greater for education compared to area deprivation and income. Compared to participants with the highest level of education, those with the lowest education were found to be 48% less likely to adhere to a healthy diet (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.60-0.64). Additionally, participants with the lowest income level were 33% less likely to maintain a healthy diet (95% CI: 0.73-0.81), and those in the most deprived areas were 13% less likely (95% CI: 0.84-0.91). Discussion/conclussion: Among the three measured proxies of socioeconomic status - education, income, and area deprivation - low education emerged as the strongest factor associated with lower adherence to a healthy diet.

Indexed as

deprivationdieteducationincomesocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID38751735
PMCPMC11094746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.