Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751670›Full record

ReviewTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2024

Circulating tumor cells

Eleonora Nicolò, Caterina Gianni, Letizia Pontolillo, Mara Serena Serafini, Laura Sofia Munoz-Arcos, Eleni Andreopoulou, Giuseppe Curigliano, Carolina Reduzzi, Massimo Cristofanilli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Rare Cell Population Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eleonora NicolòDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Caterina GianniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Letizia PontolilloDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Mara Serena SerafiniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Laura Sofia Munoz-ArcosDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Eleni AndreopoulouDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Giuseppe CuriglianoDepartment of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Carolina ReduzziDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Massimo CristofanilliDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy has emerged as a crucial tool in managing breast cancer (BC) patients, offering a minimally invasive approach to detect circulating tumor biomarkers. Until recently, the majority of the studies in BC focused on evaluating a single liquid biopsy analyte, primarily circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Despite the proven prognostic and predictive value of CTCs, their low abundance when detected using enrichment methods, especially in the early stages, poses a significant challenge. It is becoming evident that combining diverse circulating biomarkers, each representing different facets of tumor biology, has the potential to enhance the management of patients with BC. This article emphasizes the importance of considering these biomarkers as complementary/synergistic rather than competitive, recognizing their ability to contribute to a comprehensive disease profile. The review provides an overview of the clinical significance of simultaneously analyzing CTCs and other biomarkers, including cell-free circulating DNA, extracellular vesicles, non-canonical CTCs, cell-free RNAs, and non-malignant cells. Such a comprehensive liquid biopsy approach holds promise not only in BC but also in other cancer types, offering opportunities for early detection, prognostication, and therapy monitoring. However, addressing associated challenges, such as refining detection methods and establishing standardized protocols, is crucial for realizing the full potential of liquid biopsy in transforming our understanding and approach to BC. As the field evolves, collaborative efforts will be instrumental in unlocking the revolutionary impact of liquid biopsy in BC research and management.

Indexed as

Breast cancer (BC)circulating tumor cells (CTCs)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)liquid biopsytumor-derived extracellular vesicles (tdEVs)

Identifiers

PMID38751670
PMCPMC11093063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.