Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751606›Full record

ArticlePublic health reviews2024

The Relationship Between Work-Related Stress and Depression: A Scoping Review.

Jean-Baptist du Prel, Adrijana Koscec Bjelajac, Zrinka Franić, Lorena Henftling, Hana Brborović, Eva Schernhammer, Damien M McElvenny, Eda Merisalu, Nurka Pranjic, Irina Guseva Canu and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jean-Baptist du PrelDepartment of Occupational Health Science, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Adrijana Koscec BjelajacInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Zrinka FranićInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Lorena HenftlingDepartment of Occupational Health Science, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Hana BrborovićUniversity of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Eva SchernhammerDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Damien M McElvennyResearch Group, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Eda MerisaluEstonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.
Nurka PranjicDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Irina Guseva CanuDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Unisanté, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lode GodderisDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Work-related stress is highly prevalent. Recent systematic reviews concluded on a significant association between common work-related stress measures and depression. Our scoping review aims to explore whether work-related psychosocial stress is generally associated with depression or depressiveness, the extent and methodology of the primary research undertaken on this topic and to elucidate inconsistencies or gaps in knowledge. Methods: We searched for literature in Pubmed, PsycInfo and Web of Science including full reports in seven languages published between 1999 and 2022 and applied the PRISMA statement for scoping reviews criteria. Results: Of 463 primarily identified articles, 125 were retained after abstract and full-text screening. The majority report significant associations between work-related stress and depression. Cross-sectional studies are most prevalent. Sufficient evidence exists only for job strain and effort-reward imbalance. Most studies are from Asia, North America and Europe. The health sector is the most studied. Several research gaps such as the lack of interventional studies were identified. Conclusion: The consistency of most studies on the significant association between work-related stress and depression is remarkable. More studies are needed to improve evidence and to close research gaps.

Indexed as

depressive symptomseffort-reward imbalancejob strainpsychosocial work stresswork-related depression

Identifiers

PMID38751606
PMCPMC11094281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.