Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751605›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2024

P-CAB

Yutong Jiang, Rongrong Zhang, Yuxuan Fang, Ruixia Zhao, Yu Fu, Pingping Ren, Qingqing Zhan, Mingyi Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Efficacy and Safety of Tegoprazan inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Acid peptic disorder compass: An Indian expert consensus on comprehensive management.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Breaking barriers in the first-lineWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors: Which is superior forWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  9. Tegoprazan dual and quadruple therapy forFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yutong JiangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Rongrong ZhangThe First Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuxuan FangThe First Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Ruixia ZhaoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yu FuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Pingping RenThe First Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Qingqing ZhanThe First Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Mingyi ShaoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, 19 Renmin Road, Jinshui District, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1920-8800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the eradication of Objectives: The current study set out to compare the differences in the eradication rate and adverse reactions between eradication regimens based on P-CAB or PPI drugs and the differences between the vonoprazan-based and the tegoprazan-based regimens to explore the efficacy and safety of different Hp eradication regimens. Data sources and methods: Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WOS were searched from the inception of these databases up to July 2023, and eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The outcome measures were the eradication rate and the incidence of adverse reactions of different regimens in treating Hp. The results were estimated as relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and R 4.2.1 software was used to perform the network meta-analysis (NMA). Results: A total of 20 studies were included in the analysis, involving 5815 patients with Hp. In terms of eradication rate, the 2-week vonoprazan-based triple regimen (V-Tri-2w) was the best, which was superior to the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 0.9, 95% CI: (0.85-0.95)] and the 1-week tegoprazan-based triple regimen [T-Tri-1w, RR = 0.79, 95% CI: (0.64-0.97)]; the 2-week tegoprazan-based quadruple regimen (T-Qua-2w) was superior to the 1-week PPI-based triple regimen [P-Tri-1w, RR = 0.82, 95% CI: (0.67-0.99)], and there was no difference between the remaining tegoprazan-based regimens and the PPI-based or vonoprazan-based regimens. In terms of the incidence of adverse reactions, the 2-week vonoprazan-based binary regimen (V-Bi-2w) was lower than that of the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 1.98, 95% CI: (1.57-2.52)]; there was no significant difference between 1 and 2 weeks for each regimen, such as the vonoprazan-based triple regimen [RR = 1.11, 95% CI: (0.82-1.52)]. Conclusion: In the eradication treatment of Hp, the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based regimens are generally better than those of PPI-based regimens. Among them, the V-Tri-2w regimen has the highest eradication rate and may be the preferred choice for Hp eradication.

Indexed as

Hpnetwork meta-analysisP-CABPPItegoprazanvonoprazan

Identifiers

PMID38751605
PMCPMC11095192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.