ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
A Retrospective Review of Patient-reported Outcomes after Postaxial Polydactyly Ligation and Surgical Excision.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interventions for type B postaxial polydactyly include suture ligation and surgical excision, yet there is a paucity of literature comparing the outcomes of these procedures. This study sought to compare patient-reported long-term outcomes of postaxial digit excision. Methods: A six-question survey was distributed from January 2021 to March 2022 to patients who underwent treatment for type B postaxial polydactyly at a single pediatric institution from 2010 to 2016. Patients were queried about the incidence of pain sensitivity, keloid healing, and/or persistent presence of bump ("nubbin") at the treatment site. Results: A total of 158 responses accounting for 258 digits were attained for a 53% response rate. The majority of digits (67.4%, n = 174) were surgically excised. Median age at procedure was 49 days: 13.0 days for ligation, 63.0 days for surgical excision. Median age at survey was 8 [IQR 5.4-10.2] years. Short-term (<30 days after procedure) complications rate was 1.6%. The rate of a raised or sensitive scar was 39.5% (ligation 51.5% versus surgery 35.4%, Conclusion: This study suggests that suture ligation can be used in select cases without increasing the prevalence of long-term pain or sensitivity, albeit with greater risk of a bump or raised scar at the excision site compared with surgical excision.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.