ArticleSAGE open medicine2024
Evaluation of the National Tuberculosis Program and Tuberculosis Surveillance System, Jordan 2021.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women and TB/HIV coinfection in Brazil: regional inequalities and trends in a scenario of vulnerability.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Infectious disease burden and surveillance challenges in Jordan and Palestine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Evaluate and determine the gaps in the National Tuberculosis Program and Tuberculosis Surveillance System in Jordan. Methods: A concurrent embedded mixed quantitative/qualitative methods study was conducted to assess the National Tuberculosis Program and Tuberculosis Surveillance System in Jordan. A semi-structured questionnaire was developed based on the Updated CDC Guideline for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance System to collect necessary information from service providers and other stakeholders. Results: The National Tuberculosis Program and Tuberculosis Surveillance System encounter various gaps and challenges across several critical domains, including infrastructure, human resources, National Tuberculosis Program functions, surveillance system performance, coordination, case findings, and data collection and notification. Regrettably, not all of the Tuberculosis Surveillance System's objectives were successfully achieved in the past. Coordination of tuberculosis services has been repeatedly reported as inadequate. This deficiency manifests in the delay in diagnosing tuberculosis patients and, in some instances, misdiagnoses. The root cause is often traced back to insufficient knowledge of tuberculosis case definitions among healthcare providers at peripheral tuberculosis clinics. Additionally, a structured approach to active case finding is conspicuously absent. Furthermore, the tuberculosis management guidelines remain unfamiliar to many healthcare providers in tuberculosis centers, leaving them inadequately equipped to handle tuberculosis cases effectively. The utilization and analysis of the system's data are also far from optimal. A glaring concern is the delay in tuberculosis case notifications received from the stakeholders involved in the Tuberculosis Surveillance System. Conclusions: Our study showed different gaps in the National Tuberculosis Program and Tuberculosis Surveillance Systems across several areas. The structure of National Tuberculosis Program and the clinical expertise of human resources do not support tuberculosis elimination. An electronic data collection and notification system is essential to facilitate tuberculosis case detection, reporting, and follow-up. Decision-makers should push the tuberculosis epidemic on the national health agenda. Jordan should focus on allocating national and international resources for tuberculosis control programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.