ArticleTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2022
Sequential versus concurrent adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy for HR+ early breast cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Article in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chemo-endocrine therapy is the standard adjuvant treatment strategy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer. Our research aimed to compare the efficacy of adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapies, regarding different endocrinal regimens and integration sequences (sequential or concomitant), for HR+ early breast cancer. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and web of science were searched for articles published before October 2018 with Clinicaltrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov) for registered clinical trials and ASCO, AACR, ESCO, SABCS meeting abstracts for addition. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy in the adjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer patients were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted and analyzed in Bayesian analysis. Patients were stratified by menopause status. Results: Thirty-three trials with 28,515 patients and 19 treatments were enrolled. Comparisons between regimens has seen better efficacy of ovarian function suppressor (OFS) + aromatase inhibitors (AI) than OFS + tamoxifen, either used concurrently [HR =0.69, 95% credible intervals (CrI): 0.47-1.02] or sequentially with chemotherapy (HR =0.72, 95% CrI: 0.49-1.06) in premenopausal patients. Adding OFS to tamoxifen was marginally better than tamoxifen used alone (DFS: HR =0.85, 95% CrI: 0.65-1.09; OS: HR =0.77, 95% CrI: 0.52-1.08). Comparisons between different sequences of chemo-endocrine therapy proved equal efficacy in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients. Recommendation was given based on ranking of treatments. Sequential and concurrent use of chemotherapy and OFS + AI ranked equally in premenopausal patients and were recommended as the best option. However, tamoxifen ranked higher when used concurrently with chemotherapy in both premenopausal and postmenopausal HR+ early breast cancer. Conclusions: In the adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy for premenopausal HR+ early breast cancer, concurrent and sequential adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy was demonstrated of equal efficacy in both postmenopausal and premenopausal HR+ early breast cancer. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42018104889.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.