ReviewOcular oncology and pathology2024
Evidence in Focus: The Sparse Landscape of Randomized Trials on Retinoblastoma Treatment.
Review in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Definition of parameters and thresholds to detect MYCN amplification in retinoblastomas.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Retinoblastoma, although rare, is one of the most common intraocular malignancies worldwide. Its prognosis has improved significantly in the past few decades, thanks to modern treatments, like systemic, intra-arterial, and intravitreal chemotherapy. However, regarding survival, there are significant differences between high- and low-income countries, eye salvage is still a challenge worldwide, and treatment-related toxicity needs to be carefully and sufficiently managed. Summary: To appraise the strength of supporting evidence, we performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials investigating any therapeutic protocol for retinoblastoma. Four trials with 174 participants (188 eyes) were eligible, all pertaining to different intravenous chemotherapy regimens. Vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin (VEC) appear superior to a 5-drug combination for stage III retinoblastoma. Moreover, etoposide and carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by thermochemotherapy seem to offer better local control than vincristine and carboplatin. However, increasing carboplatin dose in the VEC protocol failed to improve treatment efficacy. Key Messages: Retinoblastoma is a success story of modern medicine. However, only intravenous chemotherapy has been studied through randomized trials, while evidence for the most novel retinoblastoma treatments has mainly stemmed from observational studies. International collaborations for multicenter randomized trials could overcome difficulties and increase certainty and precision in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.