Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751482›Full record

ReviewTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2023

Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) Practice Guideline 2022.

Hongyu Xiang, Yinhua Liu, Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) of the Chinese Surgical Society of the Chinese Medical Association

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decision-making driving factors in breast reconstruction among premenopausal breast cancer patients in China: a Q-methodology study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongyu XiangBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yinhua LiuBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) of the Chinese Surgical Society of the Chinese Medical Association

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) Practice Guideline 2021 was published nearly one year ago. The new guideline was revised based on comprehensive feedback of the previous publication. The aim is to provide a better reference suitable for Chinese breast surgeons. Methods: Referred to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system, evidences accepted by the Guideline were classified into four categories: I, II, III and IV, which reflected the reliability of the evidences quantitatively. The guideline also comprehensively considered the accessibility of the guideline in clinical practice in China and gave recommendations with different strengths. Results: The guideline emphasized the basic idea that a curative surgical approach falls under the category of radical tumor surgery. Six chapters, including "Diagnosis and treatment of patients with invasive breast cancer", "Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage breast cancer", "Breast-conserving surgery in patients with early-stage breast cancer", "Modified radical mastectomy of breast cancer", "Central venous access for the systemic treatment of breast cancer", and "Breast cancer in pregnancy and postpartum breast cancer" were revised. Conclusions: Compared with the 2021 edition, the new guideline has been revised in six chapters based on the latest research evidence and clinical needs.

Indexed as

Breast surgeryclinical guidelineGRADE system

Identifiers

PMID38751482
PMCPMC11093020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.