ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2024
Deep learning-based classification of the capillary ultrastructure in human skeletal muscles.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Capillary ultrastructure in human skeletal muscles is dynamic and prone to alterations in response to many stimuli, e.g., systemic pathologies such as diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension. Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, several studies have been conducted to quantify the capillary ultrastructure by means of morphometry. Deep learning techniques like convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are utilized to extract data-driven characteristics and to recognize patterns. Hence, the aim of this study was to train a CNN to identify morphometric patterns that differ between capillaries in muscle biopsies of healthy participants and patients with systemic pathologies for the purpose of hypothesis generation. Methods: In this retrospective study we used 1810 electron micrographs from human skeletal muscle capillaries derived from 70 study participants which were classified as "healthy" controls or "patients" in dependence of the absence or presence of a documented history of diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension or peripheral arterial disease. Using these micrographs, a pre-trained open-access CNN (ResNet101) was trained to discriminate between micrographs of capillaries of the two groups. The CNN with the highest diagnostic accuracies during training were subsequently compared with manual quantitative analysis of the capillary ultrastructure to distinguish between "healthy" controls and patients. Results: Using classification into controls or patients as allocation reference, receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC)-analysis of manually obtained BM thickness showed the best diagnostic accuracy of all morphometric indicators (area under the ROC-curve (AUC): 0.657 ± 0.050). The best performing CNN demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 79% (sensitivity 93%, specificity 92%). DeLong-Test of the ROC-curves showed a significant difference ( Conclusion: The hypothesis-generating approach using pretrained CNN distinguishes between capillaries depicted on electron micrographs of "healthy" controls and participants with a systemic pathology more accurately than by commonly used morphometric analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.