Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751441›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2024

Circulating tumor DNA and its role in detection, prognosis and therapeutics of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Sana Rashid, Yingchuan Sun, Umair Ali Khan Saddozai, Sikandar Hayyat, Muhammad Usman Munir, Muhammad Usman Akbar, Muhammad Babar Khawar, Zhiguang Ren, Xinying Ji, Malik Ihsan Ullah Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of methylatedFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Geographic and Viral Etiology Patterns ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sana RashidInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Lahore, Lahore 54590, Pakistan.
Yingchuan SunDepartment of Internal Oncology (Section I), Xuchang Municipal Central Hospital, Xuchang 461000, China.
Umair Ali Khan SaddozaiInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China.
Sikandar HayyatInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Lahore, Lahore 54590, Pakistan.
Muhammad Usman MunirAustralian Institute for Bioengineering & Nanotechnology, the University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
Muhammad Usman AkbarGomal Center of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan 29111, Pakistan.
Muhammad Babar KhawarInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Lahore, Lahore 54590, Pakistan.
Zhiguang RenKaifeng Municipal Key Laboratory for Infection and Biosafety, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Nuclear Protein Regulation, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Xinying JiFaculty of Basic Medical Subjects, Shu-Qing Medical College of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou 450064, China.
Malik Ihsan Ullah KhanInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Lahore, Lahore 54590, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is considered the fifth most prevalent cancer among all types of cancers and has the third most morbidity value. It has the most frequent duplication time and a high recurrence rate. Recently, the most unique technique used is liquid biopsies, which carry many markers; the most prominent is circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Varied methods are used to investigate ctDNA, including various forms of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [emulsion PCR (ePCR), digital PCR (dPCR), and bead, emulsion, amplification, magnetic (BEAMing) PCR]. Hence ctDNA is being recognized as a potential biomarker that permits early cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and predictive data on tumor burden are subjective to therapy or surgery. Numerous ctDNA biomarkers have been investigated based on their alterations such as 1) single nucleotide variations (either insertion or deletion of a nucleotide) markers including TP53, KRAS, and CCND1; 2) copy number variations which include markers such as CDK6, EFGR, MYC and BRAF; 3) DNA methylation (RASSF1A, SEPT9, KMT2C and CCNA2); 4) homozygous mutation includes ctDNA markers as CDKN2A, AXIN1; and 5) gain or loss of function of the genes, particularly for HCC. Various researchers have conducted many studies and gotten fruitful results. Still, there are some drawbacks to ctDNA namely low quantity, fragment heterogeneity, less stability, limited mutant copies and standards, and differential sensitivity. However, plenty of investigations demonstrate ctDNA's significance as a polyvalent biomarker for cancer and can be viewed as a future diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic agent. This article overviews many conditions in genetic changes linked to the onset and development of HCC, such as dysregulated signaling pathways, somatic mutations, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and genomic instability. Additionally, efforts are also made to develop treatments for HCC that are molecularly targeted and to unravel some of the genetic pathways that facilitate its early identification.

Indexed as

biomarkerscirculating tumor DNAdiagnosisHepatocellular carcinomaprognosissingle nucleotide variations

Identifiers

PMID38751441
PMCPMC11090798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.