ArticleJAMIA open2024
An infrastructure for secure data sharing: a clinical data implementation.
Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction and practice of a four-dimensional integrated one-stop outpatient service model based on patient journey mapping.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To address database interoperability challenges to improve collaboration among disparate organizations. Materials and Methods: We developed a lightweight system to allow broad but well-controlled data sharing while preserving local data protection policies. We used 2 NIST-developed technologies-Next-generation Database Access Control (NDAC) and the Data Block Matrix (DBM)-to create a proof-of-concept system called the Secure Federated Data Sharing System (SFDS). NDAC controls access to database resources down to the field level based on attributes assigned to users. The DBM manages and shares authoritative user-attribute assignments across a federation of organizations, implemented using a modified open-source permissioned blockchain, to manage and share authoritative user-attribute assignments across a federation of organizations. We used synthetic data to demonstrate a clinical research data-sharing use case using the SFDS. Results: We demonstrated, through consent, the onboarding of previously unknown users into NDAC via assignments to their DBM-validated attributes, allowing those users policy-preserving access to local database resources. The SFDS main system components-NDAC and DBM-also showed excellent performance metrics. Discussion: The SFDS provides a generic data-sharing infrastructure that effectively and securely achieves data-sharing objectives. It is completely transparent to the otherwise normal business operations of participating organizations. It requires no changes to database management systems or existing methods of authenticating and authorizing local user access to local resources. Conclusion: This efficiency, flexibility of deployment, and granularity of control make this new infrastructure solution practical for meeting the data-sharing and protection objectives of the clinical research community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.