Observational studyESC heart failure2024
Significance of QRS scoring system in left ventricular function recovery after acute myocardial infarction.
Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CD14 Blockade Modulates Macrophage-Mediated Immunological Injury in a Translational Model of Reperfused ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025Article
- Significance of QRS scoring system in left ventricular function recovery after acute myocardial infarction.ESC heart failure · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe Selvester scoring system has been derived from ECG parameters for estimating infarct size. However, there is still a lack of evidence for Selvester score as an alternative to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial injury makers for risk stratification and prediction of left ventricular function (LVF) recovery among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND
resultsThis multicentre observational study enrolled 328 STEMI patients (88.4% men, 57.3 ± 10.6 years of age) undergoing CMR examination 1 week post-reperfusion therapy. Patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% underwent a follow-up CMR 6 months later, categorized into baseline normal LVF (ejection fraction [EF] ≥ 50% at baseline, n = 155); recovered LVF (EF < 50% at baseline and ≥50% after 6 months, n = 69); and reduced LVF (EF < 50% at baseline and after 6 months, n = 104). The median follow-up was 4 (3-4) years for all patients, with 61 patients experiencing major adverse cardiovascular event (MACEs). Patients with reduced LVF had a higher risk of MACEs than those with baseline normal LVF (P = 0.01), while the recovered LVF group had no significant difference (P > 0.05). A Selvester score >10 doubled the risk of MACEs in patients with systolic dysfunction (1.91 [1.02 to 3.58], P = 0.04). Additionally, Selvester score, baseline LVEF, transmural infarction, and peak CK-MB were independent predictors of recovered LVF, with Selvester score providing incremental predictive value to peak CK-MB in predicting recovered LVF (∆AUC = 0.07, P < 0.05).
conclusionsThe Selvester score improves risk stratification among STEMI patients beyond LVEF and provide independent and incremental information to clinical parameters in predicting recovered LVF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.