Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751323›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2024

Invited commentary: mixing multiple imputation and bootstrapping for variance estimation.

Catherine X Li, Paul N Zivich

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine X LiDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8008-5734
Paul N ZivichDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9932-1095

Funding

Improved analysis of experiments and observational studies in HIVR01AI157758 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephen R Cole, Jessie Edwards · 2020 to 2026
$5.0M
The Genetic Epidemiology of Heart, Lung, and Blood TraitsTraining Grant (GenHLB)T32HL129982 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Christy Leigh Avery, KAREN L. MOHLKE · 2016 to 2026
$3.8M
Combining sources of information to improve HIV pre-exposure prophylaxisK01AI177102 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Paul Nicholas Zivich · 2023 to 2026
$545k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL129982NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI177102NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI157758NIH HHS T32HL129982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple imputation (MI) is commonly implemented to mitigate potential selection bias due to missing data. The accompanying article by Nguyen and Stuart (Am J Epidemiol. 2024;193(10):1470-1476) examines the statistical consistency of several ways of integrating MI with propensity scores. As Nguyen and Stuart noted, variance estimation for these different approaches remains to be developed. One common option is the nonparametric bootstrap, which can provide valid inference when closed-form variance estimators are not available. However, there is no consensus on how to implement MI and nonparametric bootstrapping in analyses. To complement Nguyen and Stuart's article on MI and propensity score analyses, we review some currently available approaches on variance estimation with MI and nonparametric bootstrapping.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansModels, StatisticalSelection BiasStatistics, Nonparametricmultiple imputationnonparametric bootstrappropensity scorevariance estimation

Identifiers

PMID38751323
PMCPMC11458194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.