Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751303›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of nutrition2024

A 12-week double-blind randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of dietary supplementation with 125

Stephanie Watkins, Tanja Harrison, Sohail Mushtaq

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie WatkinsFaculty of Health, Medicine and Society, University of Chester, ChesterCH1 4BJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7623-4661
Tanja HarrisonFaculty of Health, Medicine and Society, University of Chester, ChesterCH1 4BJ, UK.
Sohail MushtaqFaculty of Health, Medicine and Society, University of Chester, ChesterCH1 4BJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency has previously been linked to higher rates of exacerbation and reduced lung function in asthmatics. Previous randomised controlled trials investigating the effect of vitamin D supplementation have mainly focused on children with asthma. Trials involving adults have typically used bolus dosing regimens, and the main outcomes have been patient-focused without investigating underlying inflammation. The present study aimed to conduct a 12-week placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials administering a daily 125 µg vitamin D

Indexed as

AsthmaDietary SupplementsVitamin DAdultBiomarkersCholecalciferolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansInterleukin-10LungMaleMiddle AgedTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaVitamin D DeficiencyBiomarkersCholecalciferolInterleukin-10Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaVitamin DAsthmaDietary supplementationLung functionVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID38751303
PMCPMC11557293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.