Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38751199›Full record

ArticleACS nano2024

Epitaxial Metal Electrodeposition Controlled by Graphene Layer Thickness.

Salem C Wright, Courtney Brea, Jefferey S Baxter, Sonakshi Saini, Elif Pınar Alsaç, Sun Geun Yoon, Matthew G Boebinger, Guoxiang Hu, Matthew T McDowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Salem C WrightSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Courtney BreaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Queens College of the City University of New York, New York, New York 11367, United States.
Jefferey S BaxterCenter for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States.
Sonakshi SainiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Elif Pınar AlsaçGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Sun Geun YoonGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Matthew G BoebingerCenter for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9622-2043
Guoxiang HuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Matthew T McDowellSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5552-3456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control over material structure and morphology during electrodeposition is necessary for material synthesis and energy applications. One approach to guide crystallite formation is to take advantage of epitaxy on a current collector to facilitate crystallographic control. Single-layer graphene on metal foils can promote "remote epitaxy" during Cu and Zn electrodeposition, resulting in growth of metal that is crystallographically aligned to the substrate beneath graphene. However, the substrate-graphene-deposit interactions that allow for epitaxial electrodeposition are not well understood. Here, we investigate how different graphene layer thicknesses (monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and graphite) influence the electrodeposition of Zn and Cu. Scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron backscatter diffraction are leveraged to understand metal morphology and structure, demonstrating that remote epitaxy occurs on mono- and bilayer graphene but not trilayer or thicker. Density functional theory (DFT) simulations reveal the spatial electronic interactions through thin graphene that promote remote epitaxy. This work advances our understanding of electrochemical remote epitaxy and provides strategies for improving control over electrodeposition.

Indexed as

EBSDelectrochemistryelectrodepositionepitaxygraphenetwo-dimensional materials

Identifiers

PMID38751199
PMCPMC11140832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.