Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750616›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2024

KRT81 and HNF1A expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: investigation of predictive and prognostic value of immunohistochemistry-based subtyping.

Jia Rao, Marianne Sinn, Uwe Pelzer, Hanno Riess, Helmut Oettle, Ihsan E Demir, Helmut Friess, Carsten Jäger, Katja Steiger, Alexander Muckenhuber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jia Rao *Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-5874-8529
Marianne Sinn *Department of Haematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, CONKO-Study-Group, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Uwe PelzerDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, CONKO-Study-Group, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hanno RiessDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, CONKO-Study-Group, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Helmut OettleDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, CONKO-Study-Group, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ihsan E DemirDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Helmut FriessDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Carsten JägerDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katja SteigerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-5433
Alexander MuckenhuberInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even after decades of research, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a highly lethal disease and responses to conventional treatments remain mostly poor. Subclassification of PDAC into distinct biological subtypes has been proposed by various groups to further improve patient outcome and reduce unnecessary side effects. Recently, an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based subtyping method using cytokeratin-81 (KRT81) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1A (HNF1A) could recapitulate some of the previously established molecular subtyping methods, while providing significant prognostic and, to a limited degree, also predictive information. We refined the KRT81/HNF1A subtyping method to classify PDAC into three distinct biological subtypes. The prognostic value of the IHC-based method was investigated in two primary resected cohorts, which include 269 and 286 patients, respectively. In the second cohort, we also assessed the predictive effect for response to erlotinib + gemcitabine. In both PDAC cohorts, the new HNF1A-positive subtype was associated with the best survival, the KRT81-positive subtype with the worst, and the double-negative with an intermediate survival (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) in univariate and multivariate analyses. In the second cohort (CONKO-005), the IHC-based subtype was additionally found to have a potential predictive value for the erlotinib-based treatment effect. The revised IHC-based subtyping using KRT81 and HNF1A has prognostic significance for PDAC patients and may be of value in predicting treatment response to specific therapeutic agents.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alphaKeratins, Type IIPancreatic NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleGemcitabineHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateKeratins, Hair-SpecificMaleBiomarkers, TumorDeoxycytidineErlotinib HydrochlorideGemcitabineHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alphaHNF1A protein, humanKeratins, Hair-SpecificKeratins, Type IIKRT81 protein, humanbiomarkererlotinibHNF1AimmunohistochemistryKRT81pancreatic cancerpredictiveprognostic

Identifiers

PMID38750616
PMCPMC11096282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.