Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750602›Full record

ReviewPerioperative medicine (London, England)2024

Perioperative management of the vulnerable and failing right ventricle.

R C Arora, J K Brown, S Chatterjee, T J Gan, G Singh, M Z Tong, POQI IX Consortium

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R C AroraHarrington Heart and Vascular Institute - University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA. rakeshcarora@gmail.com.
J K BrownDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
S ChatterjeeDepartment of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
T J GanDivision of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
G SinghMazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
M Z TongHeart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
POQI IX Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under recognition combined with suboptimal management of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and failure is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. The contemporary perioperative team must be prepared with an approach for early recognition and prompt treatment. In this review, a consensus-proposed scoring system is described to provide a pragmatic approach for expeditious decision-making for these complex patients with a vulnerable RV. Importantly, this proposed scoring system incorporates the context of the planned surgical intervention. Further, as the operating room (OR) represents a unique environment where patients are susceptible to numerous insults, a practical approach to anesthetic management and monitoring both in the OR and in the intensive care unit is detailed. Lastly, an escalating approach to the management of RV failure and options for mechanical circulatory support is provided.

Indexed as

Heart failureManagementRight heart failureRight ventricleScoring system

Identifiers

PMID38750602
PMCPMC11097429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.