Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750532›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2024

Health-Related Quality of Life in severely injured patients in Finland: an observational cohort study of 325 patients with 1-year follow-up.

Antti Riuttanen, Vilma Brand, Jarkko Jokihaara, Tuomas T Huttunen, Ville M Mattila

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient-reported outcome measures within European cohorts of severely injured patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Systematic review of health utility losses from injuries and violence.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antti RiuttanenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. antti.riuttanen@pirha.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-5768
Vilma BrandTampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology Tampere, Tampere, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6143-5708
Jarkko JokihaaraDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6153-2180
Tuomas T HuttunenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-7533
Ville M MattilaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9946-4830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor trauma has a significant effect on Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL). It is unclear, however, which factors most affect HR-QoL. This study aims to evaluate HR-QoL after severe injury in Finland and determine how different injury patterns and patient-related factors, such as level of education and socioeconomic group, are associated with HR-QoL. We also assess how well different injury scoring systems associate with HR-QoL.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 325 severely injured trauma patients (aged ≥ 18 years, New Injury Severity Score, (NISS) ≥ 16, and alive at 1 year after injury) treated in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or High Dependence Unit (HDU) of Tampere University Hospital (TAUH) from 2013 through 2016. HR-QoL was assessed with the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire completed during ICU stay and 1 year after injury. HR-QOL index values and reported problems were further compared with Finnish population norms.

resultsThe severity of the injury (measured by ISS and NISS) had no significant association with the decrease in HR-QoL. Length of ICU stay had a weak negative correlation with post-injury HR-QoL and a weak positive correlation with the change in HR-QoL. The largest mean decrease in HR-QoL occurred in patients with spinal cord injury (Spine AIS ≥ 4) (-0.338 (SD 0.136)), spine injury in general (Spine AIS ≥ 2 (-0.201 (SD 0.279)), and a lower level of education (-0.157 (SD 0.231)). Patient's age, sex, or socioeconomic status did not seem to associate with smaller or greater changes in HR-QoL.

conclusionsAfter serious injury, many patients have permanent disabilities which reduce HR-QoL. Injury scoring systems intended for assessing the risk for death did not seem to associate with HR-QoL and are not, therefore, a meaningful way to predict the future HR-QoL of a severely injured patient. Recovery from the injury seems to be weaker in poorer educated patients and patients with spinal cord injury, and these patients may benefit from targeted additional measures. Although there were significant differences in baseline HR-QoL levels between different socioeconomic groups, recovery from injury appears to be similar, which is likely due to equal access to high-quality trauma care.

Indexed as

Injury Severity ScoreQuality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID38750532
PMCPMC11097464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.