Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750487›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024

Biodegradable tracheal stents: our ten-year experience with adult patients.

Ludek Stehlik, Debarya Guha, Sheetal Anandakumar, Alice Taskova, Martina Koziar Vasakova

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02620319 (Biodegradable Stents in the Management of Stenoses of the Large Airways), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02620319 nasuspendednot on this map

Biodegradable Stents in the Management of Stenoses of the Large Airways

TypeinterventionalSponsorLudek StehlikRan2013 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsTracheal StenosisArmsSX-ELLA Stent DV Tracheal (DV Stent)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ludek StehlikDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, Prague 4, 140 59, Czech Republic. ludek.stehlik@ftn.cz.
Debarya GuhaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, Prague 4, 140 59, Czech Republic.
Sheetal AnandakumarDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, Prague 4, 140 59, Czech Republic.
Alice TaskovaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, Prague 4, 140 59, Czech Republic.
Martina Koziar VasakovaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, Prague 4, 140 59, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiodegradable (BD) stents made from polydioxanone have been used only in human airways. These stents combine the advantages of classical tracheal stents, and fewer side effects are expected due to their biocompatibility and their time-limited presence in airways. However, new clinical consequences have arisen. Here, the authors share their experiences with BD stents for tracheal indications, focusing on their safety and efficacy.

methodsThis was a retrospective review of a collected database of adult patients who underwent implantation of biodegradable tracheal stents between September 2013 and December 2022 at the Department of Respiratory Medicine of the 1st Faculty of Medicine in Prague and Thomayer University Hospital. The indications included functionally significant nonmalignant tracheal stenosis and tracheomalacia. Self-expandable, biodegradable, polydioxanone tracheal stents manufactured by ELLA-CS Ltd. (Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic) were implanted during rigid bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia. All patients were followed up in the department and were provided with the necessary care. The main efficacy and safety parameters and relationships were analysed using descriptive statistics and Fisher´s exact, Wilcoxon and Kruskal‒Wallis tests.

resultsA total of 65 stents were implanted in 47 adult patients. During the first two months after implantation, when adequate function was expected, the stent was found to be effective in 26 out of 39 patients who completed this period (66.7%). The clinical effectiveness reached 89.7%, as early restenoses were mostly mild and necessitated treatment in only 4 patients. The frequencies of significant mucostasis, migration and granulation tissue growth were 2.6%, 7.5% and 23.1%, respectively, during this period. Thirty-four participants completed the half-year follow-up period after the first or second stent insertion, and some were followed up beyond this period. Poor control of symptoms, the development of restenosis and the need for interventions were characteristic of this period as the stents degraded. Twenty-two patients who experienced remodelling or stabilization of the tracheal lumen achieved a stent-free state. Seven patients underwent subsequent surgical treatment.

conclusionsBD stents are safe and provide adequate tracheal support until they begin to degrade. The use of BD stents necessitates close monitoring of patients and accurate treatment of possible restenosis.

trial registrationBased on project NT14146 - Biodegradable stents in the management of the large airways (2013-2015, MZ0/NT), registered on May 1, 2013, in the Research and Development and Innovation Information System of the Czech Republic and at ClinicalTrials.gov (reg. no. NCT02620319, December 2, 2015).

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsBronchoscopyStentsTracheal StenosisAdultAgedCzech RepublicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolydioxanoneProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesTracheaTracheomalaciaPolydioxanoneBiodegradableBronchoscopyInterventional pneumologyPolydioxanoneStentsTracheal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID38750487
PMCPMC11094873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.