Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750457›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

The association between population health management tools and clinician burnout in the United States VA primary care patient-centered medical home.

Jane Wang, Lucinda Leung, Nicholas Jackson, Michael McClean, Danielle Rose, Martin L Lee, Susan E Stockdale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jane WangDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Lucinda LeungDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Nicholas JacksonDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Michael McCleanCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Avenue, North Hills, CA, 91343, USA.
Danielle RoseCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Avenue, North Hills, CA, 91343, USA.
Martin L LeeCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Avenue, North Hills, CA, 91343, USA.
Susan E StockdaleCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Avenue, North Hills, CA, 91343, USA. susan.stockdale@va.gov.

Funding

Improving Depression Management in Primary CareIK2HX002867 · VA · VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI LEUNG, LUCINDA B · 2020 to 2025
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX002867VHA Office of Primary Care XVA 65-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnological burden and medical complexity are significant drivers of clinician burnout. Electronic health record(EHR)-based population health management tools can be used to identify high-risk patient populations and implement prophylactic health practices. Their impact on clinician burnout, however, is not well understood. Our objective was to assess the relationship between ratings of EHR-based population health management tools and clinician burnout.

methodsWe conducted cross-sectional analyses of 2018 national Veterans Health Administration(VA) primary care personnel survey, administered as an online survey to all VA primary care personnel (n = 4257, response rate = 17.7%), using bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Our analytical sample included providers (medical doctors, nurse practitioners, physicians' assistants) and nurses (registered nurses, licensed practical nurses). The outcomes included two items measuring high burnout. Primary predictors included importance ratings of 10 population health management tools (eg. VA risk prediction algorithm, recent hospitalizations and emergency department visits, etc.).

resultsHigh ratings of 9 tools were associated with lower odds of high burnout, independent of covariates including VA tenure, team role, gender, ethnicity, staffing, and training. For example, clinicians who rated the risk prediction algorithm as important were less likely to report high burnout levels than those who did not use or did not know about the tool (OR 0.73; CI 0.61-0.87), and they were less likely to report frequent burnout (once per week or more) (OR 0.71; CI 0.60-0.84).

conclusionsBurned-out clinicians may not consider the EHR-based tools important and may not be using them to perform care management. Tools that create additional technological burden may need adaptation to become more accessible, more intuitive, and less burdensome to use. Finding ways to improve the use of tools that streamline the work of population health management and/or result in less workload due to patients with poorly managed chronic conditions may alleviate burnout. More research is needed to understand the causal directional of the association between burnout and ratings of population health management tools.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalElectronic Health RecordsPatient-Centered CarePopulation Health ManagementPrimary Health CareUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesBurnoutInformation technology burdenPanel managementPopulation health management tools

Identifiers

PMID38750457
PMCPMC11094957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.