Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750436›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Integrated approach of federated learning with transfer learning for classification and diagnosis of brain tumor.

Eid Albalawi, Mahesh T R, Arastu Thakur, V Vinoth Kumar, Muskan Gupta, Surbhi Bhatia Khan, Ahlam Almusharraf

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mamba-based brain tumor segmentation of incomplete multi-modal MR images.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eid AlbalawiDepartment of Computer science, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, King faisal University, 31982, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Mahesh T RDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), 562112, Bangalore, India.
Arastu ThakurDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), 562112, Bangalore, India.
V Vinoth KumarSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, 632014, Vellore, India.
Muskan GuptaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), 562112, Bangalore, India.
Surbhi Bhatia KhanSchool of Science, Engineering and environment, University of Salford, M5 4WT, Manchester, UK. s.khan138@salford.ac.uk.
Ahlam AlmusharrafDepartment of Business Administration, College of Business and Administration, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor classification using MRI images is a crucial yet challenging task in medical imaging. Accurate diagnosis is vital for effective treatment planning but is often hindered by the complex nature of tumor morphology and variations in imaging. Traditional methodologies primarily rely on manual interpretation of MRI images, supplemented by conventional machine learning techniques. These approaches often lack the robustness and scalability needed for precise and automated tumor classification. The major limitations include a high degree of manual intervention, potential for human error, limited ability to handle large datasets, and lack of generalizability to diverse tumor types and imaging conditions.To address these challenges, we propose a federated learning-based deep learning model that leverages the power of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for automated and accurate brain tumor classification. This innovative approach not only emphasizes the use of a modified VGG16 architecture optimized for brain MRI images but also highlights the significance of federated learning and transfer learning in the medical imaging domain. Federated learning enables decentralized model training across multiple clients without compromising data privacy, addressing the critical need for confidentiality in medical data handling. This model architecture benefits from the transfer learning technique by utilizing a pre-trained CNN, which significantly enhances its ability to classify brain tumors accurately by leveraging knowledge gained from vast and diverse datasets.Our model is trained on a diverse dataset combining figshare, SARTAJ, and Br35H datasets, employing a federated learning approach for decentralized, privacy-preserving model training. The adoption of transfer learning further bolsters the model's performance, making it adept at handling the intricate variations in MRI images associated with different types of brain tumors. The model demonstrates high precision (0.99 for glioma, 0.95 for meningioma, 1.00 for no tumor, and 0.98 for pituitary), recall, and F1-scores in classification, outperforming existing methods. The overall accuracy stands at 98%, showcasing the model's efficacy in classifying various tumor types accurately, thus highlighting the transformative potential of federated learning and transfer learning in enhancing brain tumor classification using MRI images.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerBrain tumor classificationConvolutional neural networksFederated learningMedical image analysisMRI imagingVGG16

Identifiers

PMID38750436
PMCPMC11097560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.