Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750337›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2024

Healthcare disparities, screening, and molecular testing in the changing landscape of non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: a review.

Razelle Kurzrock, Aadel A Chaudhuri, David Feller-Kopman, Narjust Florez, Jed Gorden, Ignacio I Wistuba

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07460440 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

SPARC - Screening for Lung Cancer With Platelets Via an AI-enabled RNA-based Classifier

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2026 to 2028Enrolled240ConditionsLung Cancer, Lung NoduleArmsPlatelet RNA-based assay
NCT07572773 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

CHAMP: Community Health Assessment and Monitoring in the Pharmacy. Assessing the Impact of a Community Pharmacist Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorJill KolesarRan2026 to 2028Enrolled300ConditionsLung Cancer, Early Lung Cancer DetectionArmsDELFI Diagnostics FirstLook Lung Cancer Screening Blood Test, Low-Does CT Scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Geographic Access to Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening in Tennessee: Disparities by Socioeconomic Variables, Rurality, and Appalachian Status.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Razelle KurzrockMedical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center, Froedtert and Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. rkurzrock@mcw.edu.
Aadel A ChaudhuriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4511 Forest Park Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA.
David Feller-KopmanGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Narjust FlorezDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave - DA1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Jed GordenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, 1101 Madison St, Suite 900, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Ignacio I WistubaDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inequitable access to care continues to hinder improvements in diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. This review describes healthcare disparities in the changing landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States, focusing on racial, ethnic, sex-based, and socioeconomic trends. Furthermore, strategies to address disparities, overcome challenges, and improve patient outcomes are proposed. Barriers exist across lung cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment regimens, varying by sex, age, race and ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status. Incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer are higher among Black men than White men, and incidences in young women are substantially greater than in young men. Disparities may be attributed to geographic differences in screening access, with correlating higher incidence and mortality rates in rural versus urban areas. Lower socioeconomic status is also linked to lower survival rates. Several strategies could help reduce disparities and improve outcomes. Current guidelines could improve screening eligibility by incorporating sex, race, and socioeconomic status variables. Patient and clinician education on screening guidelines and patient-level barriers to care are key, and biomarker testing is critical since ~ 70% of patients with NSCLC have an actionable biomarker. Timely diagnosis, staging, and comprehensive biomarker testing, including cell-free DNA liquid biopsy, may provide valuable treatment guidance for patients with NSCLC. Efforts to improve lung cancer screening and biomarker testing access, decrease bias, and improve education about screening and testing are needed to reduce healthcare disparities in NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungEarly Detection of CancerHealthcare DisparitiesLung NeoplasmsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansUnited StatesBiomarker testingHealthcare disparitiesLung cancer screeningNon–small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID38750337
PMCPMC11554720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.