ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2024
Healthcare disparities, screening, and molecular testing in the changing landscape of non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: a review.
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SPARC - Screening for Lung Cancer With Platelets Via an AI-enabled RNA-based Classifier
CHAMP: Community Health Assessment and Monitoring in the Pharmacy. Assessing the Impact of a Community Pharmacist Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) Program
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and implementation challenges of mobile low-dose computed tomography units for early lung cancer detection: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- From Real World Data to Real Impact: A Co-Medication Framework for Lung Cancer to Advance DDI Assessment and Patient-Centric Drug Development.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Lung Cancer Survivorship: Challenges and Care Needs.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Trends in lung cancer survival: superior outcomes in US Veterans compared with the general population.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Targeting the hsa-miR-155-5p-BACH1-MMP-9 Signaling Hub in Lung Cancer: A Novel Anticancer Mechanism of Thymoquinone.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Geographic Access to Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening in Tennessee: Disparities by Socioeconomic Variables, Rurality, and Appalachian Status.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- Cancer Biomarker Test Utilization and Reimbursement in Australia: A National Analysis of Medicare Data.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Article
- Disparities in Thoracic Oncology Patients.Cancers · 2026Review
- Lung cancer in non-smoking women (LCINSW): from risk factors to precision therapy.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Community Perceptions of Executive Orders Impacting Lung Cancer Care, Research, and Mental Health.International journal of public health · 2025Article
- Review
- Integrating omics data and machine learning techniques for precision detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma: evaluating single biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inequitable access to care continues to hinder improvements in diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. This review describes healthcare disparities in the changing landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States, focusing on racial, ethnic, sex-based, and socioeconomic trends. Furthermore, strategies to address disparities, overcome challenges, and improve patient outcomes are proposed. Barriers exist across lung cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment regimens, varying by sex, age, race and ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status. Incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer are higher among Black men than White men, and incidences in young women are substantially greater than in young men. Disparities may be attributed to geographic differences in screening access, with correlating higher incidence and mortality rates in rural versus urban areas. Lower socioeconomic status is also linked to lower survival rates. Several strategies could help reduce disparities and improve outcomes. Current guidelines could improve screening eligibility by incorporating sex, race, and socioeconomic status variables. Patient and clinician education on screening guidelines and patient-level barriers to care are key, and biomarker testing is critical since ~ 70% of patients with NSCLC have an actionable biomarker. Timely diagnosis, staging, and comprehensive biomarker testing, including cell-free DNA liquid biopsy, may provide valuable treatment guidance for patients with NSCLC. Efforts to improve lung cancer screening and biomarker testing access, decrease bias, and improve education about screening and testing are needed to reduce healthcare disparities in NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.