ReviewPediatric radiology2024
Clinical and radiological evaluation of caudal regression syndrome.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiological analysis of congenital spinal deformities in patients associated with anorectal malformations: a cross-sectional study of 86 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Review
- Molecular mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of VACTERL association.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caudal regression syndrome is a form of segmental spinal dysgenesis involving the caudal spinal column, ranging from segmental coccygeal agenesis to extensive thoracolumbar agenesis with varying degrees of spinal cord dysgenesis. A majority of caudal regression cases are sporadic but maternal pre-gestational diabetes mellitus is an important risk factor. Imaging is an integral part of management of caudal regression syndrome. Antenatal diagnosis on obstetric ultrasound and evaluation with fetal MRI is ideal. Early postnatal diagnosis and/or detailed evaluation with MRI is essential for early management to improve outcomes. Pang classification categorizes caudal regression syndrome into two categories based on the position of the conus while Renshaw classification is based on the degree of vertebral column agenesis. Caudal regression syndrome may be associated with several additional anomalies, both spinal and extraspinal. A number of genitourinary and gastrointestinal anomalies have been described in association with caudal regression syndrome. The field of view of MRI of the lumbosacral spine in caudal regression syndrome needs to be extended to visualize the retroperitoneal structures without the use of a saturation band. Syndromic associations may be suspected, and additional imaging performed, based on findings of extended field of view MRI of the spine. Associated sacral masses and filar abnormalities need to be identified and may also require surgical treatment. The multisystem nature of this disease necessitates a multimodality approach to the evaluation and management of caudal regression syndrome with close cooperation between pediatric neuroradiologists and body radiologists as well as multiple clinical teams. Appropriate early management with surgical correction as necessary can significantly improve prognosis and survival in caudal regression syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38750326What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.