ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Concomitant Prediction of the Ki67 and PIT-1 Expression in Pituitary Adenoma Using Different Radiomics Models.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiomics in Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review of Clinical Applications and Predictive Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo preoperatively predict the high expression of Ki67 and positive pituitary transcription factor 1 (PIT-1) simultaneously in pituitary adenoma (PA) using three different radiomics models.
methodsA total of 247 patients with PA (training set: n = 198; test set: n = 49) were included in this retrospective study. The imaging features were extracted from preoperative contrast-enhanced T1WI (T1CE), T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). Feature selection was performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). The classic machine learning (CML), deep learning (DL), and deep learning radiomics (DLR) models were constructed using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) algorithms. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated for the training and test sets. In addition, combined with clinical characteristics, the best CML and the best DL models (SVM classifier), the DL radiomics nomogram (DLRN) was constructed to aid clinical decision-making.
resultsSeven CML features, 96 DL features, and 107 DLR features were selected to construct CML, DL and DLR models. Compared to CML and DL model, the DLR model had the best performance. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, NPV and PPV were 0.827, 0.792, 0.800, 0.796, 0.800 and 0.792 in the test set, respectively.
conclusionsCompared with CML and DL models, the DLR model shows the best performance in predicting the Ki67 and PIT-1 expression in PAs simultaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.