Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750169›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Signal enhancement ratio of multi-phase contrast-enhanced MRI: an imaging biomarker for survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Cong Xia, Jin-Rong Qu, Yi-Ping Jiao, Chun-Qiang Lu, Ben Zhao, Rong-Jun Ge, Yue Qiu, Bu-Yue Cao, Qian Yu, Tian-Yi Xia and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Cong XiaCultivation and Construction Site of the State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jin-Rong QuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yi-Ping JiaoInstitute for AI in Medicine, School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Chun-Qiang LuCultivation and Construction Site of the State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Ben ZhaoCultivation and Construction Site of the State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Rong-Jun GeSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yue QiuCultivation and Construction Site of the State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Bu-Yue CaoCultivation and Construction Site of the State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Qian YuCultivation and Construction Site of the State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Tian-Yi XiaCultivation and Construction Site of the State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xiang-Pan MengCultivation and Construction Site of the State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yang SongMR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Li-Hua ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Xue-Ying LongDepartment of Radiology, The Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jing YeDepartment of Medical Imaging, Subei People's Hospital, Medical School of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Zhi-Min DingDepartment of Radiology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
Wu CaiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Sheng-Hong JuCultivation and Construction Site of the State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. jsh@seu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5041-7865

Funding

the National Tutor System Training Program for Health Youth Key Talents in Suzhou Qngg2021006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate signal enhancement ratio (SER) for tissue characterization and prognosis stratification in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with quantitative histopathological analysis (QHA) as the reference standard.

methodsThis retrospective study included 277 PDAC patients who underwent multi-phase contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI and whole-slide imaging (WSI) from three centers (2015-2021). SER is defined as (SI

resultsThe internal dataset comprised 159 patients, which was further divided into training, validation, and internal test datasets (n = 60, 41, and 58, respectively). Sixty-five and 53 patients were included in two external test datasets. Excluding lumen, SER demonstrated significant correlations with stroma (r = 0.29-0.74, all p < 0.001) and epithelium (r = -0.23 to -0.71, all p < 0.001) across a wide post-injection time window (range, 25-300 s). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small bias between SER and QHA for quantifying stroma/epithelium in individual training, validation (all within ± 2%), and three test datasets (all within ± 4%). Moreover, SER-predicted low stromal proportion was independently associated with worse OS (HR = 1.84 (1.17-2.91), p = 0.009) in training and validation datasets, which remained significant across three combined test datasets (HR = 1.73 (1.25-2.41), p = 0.001).

conclusionSER of multi-phase CE-MRI allows for tissue characterization and prognosis stratification in PDAC. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The signal enhancement ratio of multi-phase CE-MRI can serve as a novel imaging biomarker for characterizing tissue composition and holds the potential for improving patient stratification and therapy in PDAC. KEY POINTS: Imaging biomarkers are needed to better characterize tumor tissue in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Signal enhancement ratio (SER)-predicted stromal/epithelial proportion showed good agreement with histopathology measurements across three distinct centers. Signal enhancement ratio (SER)-predicted stromal proportion was demonstrated to be an independent prognostic factor for OS in PDAC.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaContrast MediaMagnetic Resonance ImagingPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDeep LearningFemaleHumansImage EnhancementMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaDigital pathologyMulti-phase contrast-enhanced MRIPancreatic adenocarcinomaSignal enhancement ratioTumor tissue composition

Identifiers

PMID38750169
PMCPMC11519106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.