Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750164›Full record

ArticleNature nanotechnology2024

A large-scale machine learning analysis of inorganic nanoparticles in preclinical cancer research.

Bárbara B Mendes, Zilu Zhang, João Conniot, Diana P Sousa, João M J M Ravasco, Lauren A Onweller, Andżelika Lorenc, Tiago Rodrigues, Daniel Reker, João Conde

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature nanotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. ACS nano medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Advancements in Drug Delivery Systems in Glioblastoma Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bárbara B Mendes *ToxOmics, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8630-1119
Zilu Zhang *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-2180-5957
João ConniotToxOmics, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Diana P SousaToxOmics, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3474-5417
João M J M RavascoToxOmics, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Lauren A OnwellerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-0865-4495
Andżelika LorencInstituto de Investigação do Medicamento (iMed), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1474-7864
Tiago RodriguesInstituto de Investigação do Medicamento (iMed), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. tiago.rodrigues@ff.ulisboa.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-1581-5654
Daniel RekerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. daniel.reker@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4789-7380
João CondeToxOmics, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. joao.conde@nms.unl.pt.ORCID 0000-0001-8422-6792

Funding

Designing Personalized Formulations with Machine LearningR35GM151255 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel Reker · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
Longitudinal Aging Biomarker Study in India (LASI-Biomarkers)R21AG034443 · NIA · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BLOOM, DAVID E, HU, PEIFENG · 2011 to 2012
$392k
EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) ERC-StG-2019-848325NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM151255NSF DGE2129754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to their distinct physical and chemical properties, inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) have shown promising results in preclinical cancer therapy, but designing and engineering them for effective therapeutic purposes remains a challenge. Although a comprehensive database of inorganic NP research is not currently available, it is crucial for developing effective cancer therapies. In this context, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a transformative tool, but its adaptation to nanomedicine is hindered by inexistent or small datasets. Here we assembled a large database of inorganic NPs, comprising experimental datasets from 745 preclinical studies in cancer nanomedicine. Using descriptive statistics and explainable ML models we mined this database to gain knowledge of inorganic NP design patterns and inform future NP research for cancer treatment. Our analyses suggest that NP shape and therapy type are prominent features in determining in vivo efficacy, measured as a percentage of tumour reduction. Moreover, our database provides a large-scale open-access resource for discriminative ML that the broader nanotechnology community can utilize. Our work blueprints data mining for translational cancer research and offers evidence for standardizing NP reporting to accelerate and de-risk inorganic NP-based drug delivery, which may help to improve patient outcomes in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNanomedicineNanoparticlesNeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDatabases, FactualHumansMiceAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.