Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750086›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

An adaptive prosthetic socket for people with transtibial amputation.

Joan E Sanders, Andrew C Vamos, Joseph C Mertens, Katheryn J Allyn, Brian G Larsen, Daniel Ballesteros, Horace Wang, Nicholas S DeGrasse, Joseph L Garbini, Brian J Hafner and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Testing an adjustable prosthetic socket in a simulated military environment.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joan E SandersDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. jsanders@uw.edu.
Andrew C VamosDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Joseph C MertensDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Katheryn J AllynDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Brian G LarsenDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Daniel BallesterosDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Horace WangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Nicholas S DeGrasseDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Joseph L GarbiniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, 3900 E Stevens Way NE, Box 352600, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Brian J HafnerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356490, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Janna L FriedlyDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359612, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is essential that people with limb amputation maintain proper prosthetic socket fit to prevent injury. Monitoring and adjusting socket fit, for example by removing the prosthesis to add prosthetic socks, is burdensome and can adversely affect users' function and quality-of-life. This study presents results from take-home testing of a motor-driven adaptive socket that automatically adjusted socket size during walking. A socket fit metric was calculated from inductive sensor measurements of the distance between the elastomeric liner surrounding the residual limb and the socket's inner surface. A proportional-integral controller was implemented to adjust socket size. When tested on 12 participants with transtibial amputation, the controller was active a mean of 68% of the walking time. In general, participants who walked more than 20 min/day demonstrated greater activity, less doff time, and fewer manual socket size adjustments for the adaptive socket compared with a locked non-adjustable socket and a motor-driven socket that participants adjusted with a smartphone application. Nine of 12 participants reported that they would use a motor-driven adjustable socket if it were available as it would limit their socket fit issues. The size and weight of the adaptive socket were considered the most important variables to improve.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalArtificial LimbsProsthesis DesignTibiaWalkingAdultAgedAmputeesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis FittingQuality of LifeAdaptive prosthesisAmputee comfortAuto-adjusting socketClosed-loop controlFunctional outcomeSocket fit

Identifiers

PMID38750086
PMCPMC11096356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.