Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38750084›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Prediction of treatment response after stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastasis using deep learning and radiomics on longitudinal MRI data.

Se Jin Cho, Wonwoo Cho, Dongmin Choi, Gyuhyeon Sim, So Yeong Jeong, Sung Hyun Baik, Yun Jung Bae, Byung Se Choi, Jae Hyoung Kim, Sooyoung Yoo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Se Jin Cho *Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-Ro 173Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Wonwoo Cho *Kim Jaechul Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence, KAIST, 291 Daehak-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
Dongmin ChoiKim Jaechul Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence, KAIST, 291 Daehak-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
Gyuhyeon SimKim Jaechul Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence, KAIST, 291 Daehak-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
So Yeong JeongDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-Ro 173Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Sung Hyun BaikDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-Ro 173Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Yun Jung BaeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-Ro 173Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Byung Se ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-Ro 173Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Jae Hyoung KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-Ro 173Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Sooyoung YooOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-Ro 173Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Jung Ho HanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-Ro 173Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Chae-Yong KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-Ro 173Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Jaegul Choo *Kim Jaechul Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence, KAIST, 291 Daehak-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea. jchoo@kaist.ac.kr.
Leonard Sunwoo *Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-Ro 173Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea. leonard.sunwoo@gmail.com.

Funding

Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI22C0471National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2018R1C1B6007917SNUBH Research Fund 13-2021-0009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed artificial intelligence models to predict the brain metastasis (BM) treatment response after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and evaluated prediction accuracy changes according to the number of sequential MRI scans. We included four sequential MRI scans for 194 patients with BM and 369 target lesions for the Developmental dataset. The data were randomly split (8:2 ratio) for training and testing. For external validation, 172 MRI scans from 43 patients with BM and 62 target lesions were additionally enrolled. The maximum axial diameter (Dmax), radiomics, and deep learning (DL) models were generated for comparison. We evaluated the simple convolutional neural network (CNN) model and a gated recurrent unit (Conv-GRU)-based CNN model in the DL arm. The Conv-GRU model performed superior to the simple CNN models. For both datasets, the area under the curve (AUC) was significantly higher for the two-dimensional (2D) Conv-GRU model than for the 3D Conv-GRU, Dmax, and radiomics models. The accuracy of the 2D Conv-GRU model increased with the number of follow-up studies. In conclusion, using longitudinal MRI data, the 2D Conv-GRU model outperformed all other models in predicting the treatment response after SRS of BM.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRadiomicsTreatment OutcomeBrain metastasisDeep learningLongitudinal analysisRadiomicsStereotactic radiosurgeryTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID38750084
PMCPMC11096355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.