ArticleScientific reports2024
Heart rate variability helps classify phenotype in systemic sclerosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to develop a systemic sclerosis (SSc) subtypes classifier tool to be used at the patient's bedside. We compared the heart rate variability (HRV) at rest (5-min) and in response to orthostatism (5-min) of patients (n = 58) having diffuse (n = 16, dcSSc) and limited (n = 38, lcSSc) cutaneous forms. The HRV was evaluated from the beat-to-beat RR intervals in time-, frequency-, and nonlinear-domains. The dcSSc group differed from the lcSSc group mainly by a higher heart rate (HR) and a lower HRV, in decubitus and orthostatism conditions. Stand-up maneuver lowered HR standard deviation (sd_HR), the major axis length of the fitted ellipse of Poincaré plot of RR intervals (SD2), and the correlation dimension (CorDim) in the dcSSc group while increased these HRV indexes in the lcSSc group (p = 0.004, p = 0.002, and p = 0.004, respectively). We identified the 5 most informative and discriminant HRV variables. We then compared 341 classifying models (1 to 5 variables combinations × 11 classifier algorithms) according to mean squared error, logloss, sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, area under curve of the ROC-curves and F1-score. F1-score ranged from 0.823 for the best 1-variable model to a maximum of 0.947 for the 4-variables best model. Most specific and precise models included sd_HR, SD2, and CorDim. In conclusion, we provided high performance classifying models able to distinguish diffuse from limited cutaneous SSc subtypes easy to perform at the bedside from ECG recording. Models were based on 1 to 5 HRV indexes used as nonlinear markers of autonomic integrated influences on cardiac activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.