ArticleCancer science2024
Performance of an ancillary test for cervical cancer that measures miRNAs and cytokines in serum and cervical mucus.
Article in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- The application value of serum Th1/Th2 cytokines combined with tumour markers in the diagnosis of HR-HPV-positive cervical cancer.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Identification of candidate microRNA biomarkers of endometriosis in different bodily fluids.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Identification and modulation of a PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway-targeting microRNA in order to increase colorectal cancer cells radiosensitivity in vitro.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Distinct cervical microbiome and metabolite profiles before and after menopause: implications for cervical cancer progression.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Performance of an ancillary test for cervical cancer that measures miRNAs and cytokines in serum and cervical mucus.Cancer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, human papillomavirus tests and cytology are used to screen for cervical cancer. However, more accurate ancillary screening tests are needed. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and cytokines are promising biomarkers that are aberrantly expressed in cervical cancer. Therefore, the potential of developing new screening markers based on the levels of miRNAs and cytokines in serum and local mucus samples from the same patients with cervical neoplasia was investigated. miRNA screening was performed by microarray and measurement using real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR. Cytokine were measured using multiplex bead assay, and changes in expressions were analyzed based on disease severity. As lesions progressed, miR-20b-5p, -155-5p, -144-3p, -451a, and -126-3p expression levels were increased in mucus, and miR-16-5p, -223-3p, and -451a expression levels were decreased in serum. Regarding cytokines, IL-6, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, Eotaxin, interferon-γ, and RANTES were increased, whereas granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was significantly decreased in mucus. miRNAs and cytokines in serum did not have high diagnostic accuracy. However, a combination of miR-20b-5p, -451a, -126-3p, Eotaxin, as well as G-CSF in mucus samples, had high diagnostic accuracy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.989 (0.979-0.999). Our results suggest that using mucus for this ancillary test is more beneficial than serum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.