Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38749550›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2024

Long acting progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pill for preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain: the PRE-EMPT pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial.

Kevin G Cooper, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Jane P Daniels, Andrew W Horne, T Justin Clark, Ertan Saridogan, Versha Cheed, Danielle Pirie, Melyda Melyda, Mark Monahan and 5 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Progestagens for pain symptoms associated with endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The long road of drug development for endometriosis - Pains, gains, and hopes.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kevin G CooperAberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-0071
Siladitya BhattacharyaSchool of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Jane P DanielsNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Andrew W HorneMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
T Justin ClarkAcademic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ertan SaridoganElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Versha CheedBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Danielle PirieAberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.
Melyda MelydaHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mark MonahanHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tracy E RobertsHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Emma CoxEndometriosis UK, London, UK.
Clive StubbsBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lee J MiddletonBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
PRE-EMPT Collaborative Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of long acting progestogens compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain.

designThe PRE-EMPT (preventing recurrence of endometriosis) pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial.

setting34 UK hospitals.

participants405 women of reproductive age undergoing conservative surgery for endometriosis.

interventionsParticipants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio using a secure internet facility to a long acting progestogen (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system) or the combined oral contraceptive pill.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was pain measured three years after randomisation using the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes (evaluated at six months, one, two, and three years) included the four core and six modular domains of the EHP-30, and treatment failure (further therapeutic surgery or second line medical treatment).

results405 women were randomised to receive a long acting progestogen (n=205) or combined oral contraceptive pill (n=200). At three years, there was no difference in pain scores between the groups (adjusted mean difference -0.8, 95% confidence interval -5.7 to 4.2, P=0.76), which had improved by around 40% in both groups compared with preoperative values (an average of 24 and 23 points for long acting progestogen and combined oral contraceptive pill groups, respectively). Most of the other domains of the EHP-30 also showed improvement at all time points compared with preoperative scores, without evidence of any differences between groups. Women randomised to a long acting progestogen underwent fewer surgical procedures or second line treatments compared with those randomised to the combined oral contraceptive pill group (73

conclusionsPostoperative prescription of a long acting progestogen or the combined oral contraceptive pill results in similar levels of improvement in endometriosis related pain at three years, with both groups showing around a 40% improvement compared with preoperative levels. While women can be reassured that both options are effective, the reduced risk of repeat surgery for endometriosis and hysterectomy might make long acting reversible progestogens preferable for some.

trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN97865475.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, Oral, CombinedEndometriosisLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateAdultFemaleHumansIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedPain MeasurementPelvic PainProgestinsSecondary PreventionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultContraceptives, Oral, CombinedLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateProgestins

Identifiers

PMID38749550
PMCPMC11094611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.