Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748971›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2024

Fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: international Delphi consensus on management and core outcome set.

H J Mustafa, A Khalil, S Johnson, S J Gordijn, W Ganzevoort, C Melling, C J Koh, G T Mandy, M D Kilby, A Johnson and 5 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

H J MustafaThe Fetal Center at Riley Children's and Indiana University Health, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Riley Children's Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5611-1231
A KhalilFetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2802-7670
S JohnsonBarts and the London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
S J GordijnMaternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3915-8609
W GanzevoortMaternal-Fetal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7243-2115
C MellingPaediatric Urology, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
C J KohDivision of Pediatric Urology, Texas Children's Hospital and Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
G T MandyNeonatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
M D KilbyFetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's & Children's Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9987-4223
A JohnsonDivision of Fetal Intervention, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
R A QuinteroThe Fetal Institute Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
G RyanThe Ontario Fetal Centre, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
A A ShamshirsazMaternal-Fetal Care Center, Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
A A NassrMaternal-Fetal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1924-7965
LUTO Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo reach an international expert consensus on the diagnosis, prognosis and management of fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) by means of a Delphi procedure, and to use this to define a core outcome set (COS).

methodsA three-round Delphi procedure was conducted among an international panel of experts in fetal LUTO. The panel was provided with a list of literature-based parameters to consider for the diagnosis, prognosis, management and outcomes of LUTO. A parallel procedure was conducted with patient groups during the development of the COS.

resultsA total of 168 experts were approached, of whom 99 completed the first round and 80/99 (80.8%) completed all three rounds of the study questionnaires. Consensus was reached that, in the first trimester, an objective measurement of longitudinal bladder diameter of ≥ 7 mm should be used to suspect LUTO. In the second trimester, imaging parameters suggestive of LUTO could include enlarged bladder, keyhole sign, bladder wall thickening, bilateral hydronephrosis, bilateral hydroureteronephrosis and male sex. There was 79% agreement that the current prognostic scoring systems in the literature should not be used clinically. However, experts agreed on the value of amniotic fluid volume (at < 24 weeks) to predict survival and that the value of fetal intervention is to improve the chance of neonatal survival. Experts endorsed sonographic parameters suggestive of renal dysplasia, at least one vesicocentesis, and renal biochemistry for prognosis and counseling, but these items did not reach a consensus for determining candidacy for fetal intervention. On the other hand, imaging parameters suggestive of LUTO, absence of life-limiting structural or genetic anomalies, gestational age of ≥ 16 weeks and oligohydramnios (defined as deepest vertical pocket < 2 cm) should be used as candidacy criteria for fetal intervention based on expert consensus. If bladder refill was evaluated, it should be assessed subjectively. Vesicoamniotic shunt should be the first line of fetal intervention. In the presence of suspected fetal renal failure, serial amnioinfusion should be offered only as an experimental procedure under research protocols. A COS for future LUTO studies was agreed upon.

conclusionInternational consensus on the diagnosis, prognosis and management of fetal LUTO, as well as the COS, should inform clinical care and research to optimize perinatal outcomes. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueFetal DiseasesUltrasonography, PrenatalFemaleHumansMalePregnancyPrognosisUrethral ObstructionUrinary Bladderconsensuscore outcome setDelphiLUTOmegacystisobstructive uropathypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38748971
PMCPMC11579430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.