ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
Artificial neural networks for model identification and parameter estimation in computational cognitive models.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep-Learning: An Emerging Tool to Support Model-Informed Drug Development.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Deep-Learning- versus Hypothesis-Driven Modeling in Model-Informed Drug Development: A PK/PD Case Study.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Excessive Flexibility? Recurrent Neural Networks Can Accommodate Individual Differences in Reinforcement Learning Through In-Context Adaptation.Computational brain & behavior · 2026Article
- Article
- phyddle: Software for Exploring Phylogenetic Models with Deep Learning.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- Rules of life at the interface of calcium signaling and mechanobiology.APL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Latent variable sequence identification for cognitive models with neural network estimators.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- The Tweedledum and Tweedledee of dynamic decisions: Discriminating between diffusion decision and accumulator models.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- phyddle: software for exploring phylogenetic models with deep learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Flexible inference for animal learning rules using neural networks.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2025Article
- Latent Learning Progress Drives Autonomous Goal Selection in Human Reinforcement Learning.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024Article
- Bridging theory and data: A computational workflow for cultural evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Language models outperform cloze predictability in a cognitive model of reading.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational cognitive models have been used extensively to formalize cognitive processes. Model parameters offer a simple way to quantify individual differences in how humans process information. Similarly, model comparison allows researchers to identify which theories, embedded in different models, provide the best accounts of the data. Cognitive modeling uses statistical tools to quantitatively relate models to data that often rely on computing/estimating the likelihood of the data under the model. However, this likelihood is computationally intractable for a substantial number of models. These relevant models may embody reasonable theories of cognition, but are often under-explored due to the limited range of tools available to relate them to data. We contribute to filling this gap in a simple way using artificial neural networks (ANNs) to map data directly onto model identity and parameters, bypassing the likelihood estimation. We test our instantiation of an ANN as a cognitive model fitting tool on classes of cognitive models with strong inter-trial dependencies (such as reinforcement learning models), which offer unique challenges to most methods. We show that we can adequately perform both parameter estimation and model identification using our ANN approach, including for models that cannot be fit using traditional likelihood-based methods. We further discuss our work in the context of the ongoing research leveraging simulation-based approaches to parameter estimation and model identification, and how these approaches broaden the class of cognitive models researchers can quantitatively investigate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.