ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024
Improving Estimates of Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) Concentration from In Situ Fluorescence Measurements across Estuaries and Coastal Wetlands.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unlocking Soil Health and Surface Water Quality Management: A Review on Fluorescent Dissolved Organic Matter (fDOM) in Agricultural Systems.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of optical proxies is essential to the sustained monitoring of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in estuaries and coastal wetlands, where dynamics occur on subhour time scales. In situ dissolved organic matter (DOM) fluorescence, or FDOM, is now routinely measured along with ancillary water-quality indicators by commercial sondes. However, its reliability as an optical proxy of DOC concentration is often limited by uncertainties caused by in situ interferences and by variability in DOM composition and water matrix (ionic strength, pH) that are typical at the land-ocean interface. Although corrections for in situ interferences already exist, validated strategies to account for changes in the DOM composition and water matrix in these systems are still lacking. The transferability of methods across systems is also poorly known. Here, we used a comprehensive data set of laboratory-based excitation-emission matrix fluorescence and DOC concentration matched to in situ sonde measurements to develop and compare approaches that leverage ancillary water-quality indicators to improve estimates of DOC concentration from FDOM. Our analyses demonstrated the validity of in situ interference correction schemes, the importance of ancillary water-quality indicators to account for DOM composition and water matrix change, and the good transferability of the proposed methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.