Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748584›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Threshold current density for diffusion-controlled stability of electrolytic surface nanobubbles.

Yixin Zhang, Xiaojue Zhu, Jeffery A Wood, Detlef Lohse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yixin ZhangPhysics of Fluids Group, Max Planck Center Twente for Complex Fluid Dynamics and Johannes Martinus Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4632-3780
Xiaojue ZhuMax Planck Institute for Solar System Research, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7878-0655
Jeffery A WoodMembrane Science and Technology Cluster, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9438-1048
Detlef LohsePhysics of Fluids Group, Max Planck Center Twente for Complex Fluid Dynamics and Johannes Martinus Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4138-2255

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) DE-NL 20002799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the stability mechanism of surface micro/nanobubbles adhered to gas-evolving electrodes is essential for improving the efficiency of water electrolysis, which is known to be hindered by the bubble coverage on electrodes. Using molecular simulations, the diffusion-controlled evolution of single electrolytic nanobubbles on wettability-patterned nanoelectrodes is investigated. These nanoelectrodes feature hydrophobic islands as preferential nucleation sites and allow the growth of nanobubbles in the pinning mode. In these simulations, a threshold current density distinguishing stable nanobubbles from unstable nanobubbles is found. When the current density remains below the threshold value, nucleated nanobubbles grow to their equilibrium states, maintaining their nanoscopic size. However, for the current density above the threshold value, nanobubbles undergo unlimited growth and can eventually detach due to buoyancy. Increasing the pinning length of nanobubbles increases the degree of nanobubble instability. By connecting the current density with the local gas oversaturation, an extension of the stability theory for surface nanobubbles [Lohse and Zhang,

Indexed as

electrolysisnanobubblenanofluidics

Identifiers

PMID38748584
PMCPMC11126992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.