Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748577›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Synergistic induction of blood-brain barrier properties.

Gergő Porkoláb, Mária Mészáros, Anikó Szecskó, Judit P Vigh, Fruzsina R Walter, Ricardo Figueiredo, Ildikó Kálomista, Zsófia Hoyk, Gaszton Vizsnyiczai, Ilona Gróf and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Synthetic Cyclic CAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of the blood-brain barrier.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Science advances · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Gergő PorkolábInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.
Mária MészárosInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4847-9618
Anikó SzecskóInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-6210-1689
Judit P VighInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4694-3891
Fruzsina R WalterInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.
Ricardo FigueiredoGenXPro GmbH, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3024-1254
Ildikó KálomistaIn Vitro Metabolism Laboratory, Gedeon Richter, Budapest H-1103, Hungary.
Zsófia HoykInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2435-3444
Gaszton VizsnyiczaiInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.
Ilona GrófInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0005-4258-8636
Jeng-Shiung JanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8379-404X
Fabien GosseletLaboratoire de la Barriére Hémato-Encéphalique, Université d'Artois, Lens 62307, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0481-5026
Melinda K PirityInstitute of Genetics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2949-3510
Monika VastagIn Vitro Metabolism Laboratory, Gedeon Richter, Budapest H-1103, Hungary.
Natalie HudsonSmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 VF25, Ireland.
Matthew CampbellSmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 VF25, Ireland.
Szilvia VeszelkaInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8864-1184
Mária A DeliInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Research Network, Szeged H-6726, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-6524

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) 864522Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH) SA-111/2021Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (MTA) NAP2022-I-6/2022National Research, Development and Innovation Office FK143233National Research, Development and Innovation Office K143766National Research, Development and Innovation Office PD138930Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) 16/RC/3948Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Eye-D-21/SPP/3732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood-brain barrier (BBB) models derived from human stem cells are powerful tools to improve our understanding of cerebrovascular diseases and to facilitate drug development for the human brain. Yet providing stem cell-derived endothelial cells with the right signaling cues to acquire BBB characteristics while also retaining their vascular identity remains challenging. Here, we show that the simultaneous activation of cyclic AMP and Wnt/β-catenin signaling and inhibition of the TGF-β pathway in endothelial cells robustly induce BBB properties in vitro. To target this interaction, we present a small-molecule cocktail named cARLA, which synergistically enhances barrier tightness in a range of BBB models across species. Mechanistically, we reveal that the three pathways converge on Wnt/β-catenin signaling to mediate the effect of cARLA via the tight junction protein claudin-5. We demonstrate that cARLA shifts the gene expressional profile of human stem cell-derived endothelial cells toward the in vivo brain endothelial signature, with a higher glycocalyx density and efflux pump activity, lower rates of endocytosis, and a characteristic endothelial response to proinflammatory cytokines. Finally, we illustrate how cARLA can improve the predictive value of human BBB models regarding the brain penetration of drugs and targeted nanoparticles. Due to its synergistic effect, high reproducibility, and ease of use, cARLA has the potential to advance drug development for the human brain by improving BBB models across laboratories.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierEndothelial CellsAnimalsbeta CateninClaudin-5Cyclic AMPHumansMiceStem CellsTight JunctionsWnt Signaling Pathwaybeta CateninClaudin-5Cyclic AMPblood–brain barrierdrug deliveryendothelial cellin vitro modelssignaling pathways

Identifiers

PMID38748577
PMCPMC11126970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.