ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024
Application and Comparison of Machine Learning and Database-Based Methods in Taxonomic Classification of High-Throughput Sequencing Data.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kun-peng enables scalable and accurate pan-domain metagenomic classification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- deMEM: a novel divide-and-conquer framework based on de Bruijn graph for scalable multiple sequence alignment.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis across metagenomic taxonomic classifiers: A case study of the gut microbiome in aging and longevity in the Integrative Longevity Omics Study.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Gene signatures of palmitoylation and fatty acid metabolism predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in breast cancer patients by machine learning, single-cell analysis, and experimental validation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- ViTax-RAG: a retrieval-augmented language modeling tool for viral contig taxonomic classification.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- HAlign-G: rapid and low-memory multiple-genome aligner for large-scale closely related genomes.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Computational Metagenomics: State of the Art.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- OpenFungi: A Machine Learning Dataset for Fungal Image Recognition Tasks.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fast sequence alignment for centromeres with RaMA.Genome research · 2025Article
- Cotton under heat stress: a comprehensive review of molecular breeding, genomics, and multi-omics strategies.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- HAlign 4: a new strategy for rapidly aligning millions of sequences.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has not only revolutionized the field of bioinformatics but has also heightened the demand for efficient taxonomic classification. Despite technological advancements, efficiently processing and analyzing the deluge of sequencing data for precise taxonomic classification remains a formidable challenge. Existing classification approaches primarily fall into two categories, database-based methods and machine learning methods, each presenting its own set of challenges and advantages. On this basis, the aim of our study was to conduct a comparative analysis between these two methods while also investigating the merits of integrating multiple database-based methods. Through an in-depth comparative study, we evaluated the performance of both methodological categories in taxonomic classification by utilizing simulated data sets. Our analysis revealed that database-based methods excel in classification accuracy when backed by a rich and comprehensive reference database. Conversely, while machine learning methods show superior performance in scenarios where reference sequences are sparse or lacking, they generally show inferior performance compared with database methods under most conditions. Moreover, our study confirms that integrating multiple database-based methods does, in fact, enhance classification accuracy. These findings shed new light on the taxonomic classification of high-throughput sequencing data and bear substantial implications for the future development of computational biology. For those interested in further exploring our methods, the source code of this study is publicly available on https://github.com/LoadStar822/Genome-Classifier-Performance-Evaluator. Additionally, a dedicated webpage showcasing our collected database, data sets, and various classification software can be found at http://lab.malab.cn/~tqz/project/taxonomic/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.