Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748485›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024

Application and Comparison of Machine Learning and Database-Based Methods in Taxonomic Classification of High-Throughput Sequencing Data.

Qinzhong Tian, Pinglu Zhang, Yixiao Zhai, Yansu Wang, Quan Zou

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computational Metagenomics: State of the Art.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qinzhong TianInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8073-3582
Pinglu ZhangInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0002-1788-3084
Yixiao ZhaiInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yansu WangInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Quan ZouInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6406-1142

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62373080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has not only revolutionized the field of bioinformatics but has also heightened the demand for efficient taxonomic classification. Despite technological advancements, efficiently processing and analyzing the deluge of sequencing data for precise taxonomic classification remains a formidable challenge. Existing classification approaches primarily fall into two categories, database-based methods and machine learning methods, each presenting its own set of challenges and advantages. On this basis, the aim of our study was to conduct a comparative analysis between these two methods while also investigating the merits of integrating multiple database-based methods. Through an in-depth comparative study, we evaluated the performance of both methodological categories in taxonomic classification by utilizing simulated data sets. Our analysis revealed that database-based methods excel in classification accuracy when backed by a rich and comprehensive reference database. Conversely, while machine learning methods show superior performance in scenarios where reference sequences are sparse or lacking, they generally show inferior performance compared with database methods under most conditions. Moreover, our study confirms that integrating multiple database-based methods does, in fact, enhance classification accuracy. These findings shed new light on the taxonomic classification of high-throughput sequencing data and bear substantial implications for the future development of computational biology. For those interested in further exploring our methods, the source code of this study is publicly available on https://github.com/LoadStar822/Genome-Classifier-Performance-Evaluator. Additionally, a dedicated webpage showcasing our collected database, data sets, and various classification software can be found at http://lab.malab.cn/~tqz/project/taxonomic/.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMachine LearningClassificationComputational BiologyDatabases, Geneticcomparisondatabasemachine learningmetagenomicstaxonomic classification

Identifiers

PMID38748485
PMCPMC11135637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.