Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748472›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Rapport Building in Written Crisis Services: Qualitative Content Analysis.

Laura Schwab-Reese, Caitlyn Short, Larel Jacobs, Michelle Fingerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura Schwab-ReeseDepartment of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9174-1730
Caitlyn ShortDepartment of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-2099-7677
Larel JacobsChildhelp, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1242-8843
Michelle FingermanChildhelp, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8223-7292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBuilding therapeutic relationships and social presence are challenging in digital services and maybe even more difficult in written services. Despite these difficulties, in-person care may not be feasible or accessible in all situations.

objectiveThis study aims to categorize crisis counselors' efforts to build rapport in written conversations by using deidentified conversation transcripts from the text and chat arms of the National Child Abuse Hotline. Using these categories, we identify the common characteristics of successful conversations. We defined success as conversations where help-seekers reported the hotline was a good way to seek help and that they were a lot more hopeful, a lot more informed, a lot more prepared to address the situation, and experiencing less stress, as reported by help-seekers.

methodsThe sample consisted of transcripts from 314 purposely selected conversations from of the 1153 text and chat conversations during July 2020. Hotline users answered a preconversation survey (ie, demographics) and a postconversation survey (ie, their perceptions of the conversation). We used qualitative content analysis to process the conversations.

resultsActive listening skills, including asking questions, paraphrasing, reflecting feelings, and interpreting situations, were commonly used by counselors. Validation, unconditional positive regard, and evaluation-based language, such as praise and apologies, were also often used. Compared with less successful conversations, successful conversations tended to include fewer statements that attend to the emotional dynamics. There were qualitative differences in how the counselors applied these approaches. Generally, crisis counselors in positive conversations tended to be more specific and tailor their comments to the situation.

conclusionsBuilding therapeutic relationships and social presence are essential to digital interventions involving mental health professionals. Prior research demonstrates that they can be challenging to develop in written conversations. Our work demonstrates characteristics associated with successful conversations that could be adopted in other written help-seeking interventions.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchAdultCommunicationCrisis InterventionFemaleHotlinesHumansMaleMiddle AgedWritingaffectchatchat hotlinechild abusechild maltreatmentcontent analysiscounselingcounseling psychologycrisiscrisis hotlinedeductivedigital empathyemotionemotional dynamicemotional dynamicsempathyfamily violencehotlineinductiveteletelehealthtexttext hotlinetherapeutic relationshipstherapy

Identifiers

PMID38748472
PMCPMC11137431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.