ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024
Typing of Treponema pallidum in a Brazilian sample and follow-up of treatment using molecular assays.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Syphilis remains a significant public health concern, with serological assays being the primary method for diagnosis. However, molecular techniques have proven to be reliable tools for the diagnosis and understanding of the transmission dynamics of Treponema pallidum infection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of syphilis treatment using molecular assays, perform Enhanced Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC) typing, and analyze resistance (macrolide and doxycycline) in the T. pallidum isolate. PCR assay amplified treponemal DNA only from the lesion sample, whereas qPCR was able to amplify DNA in both lesion and blood samples before treatment. Throughout the treatment follow-up, qPCR effectively did not identify treponemal DNA in the blood for up to one to two weeks after treatment. ECDC typing revealed the genotype 14 e/g in the Brazilian T. pallidum isolate, and the presence of the A2058G mutation in 23 S rRNA gene, indicating macrolide resistance. Although, the G1058C mutation in 16 S rRNA gene was not detected. Notably, qPCR demonstrated its potential for diagnosing T. pallidum in blood samples, even when the treponemal DNA levels were low, enabling more accurate and sensitive diagnosis and guiding better syphilis therapy. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first identification of subtype 14 e/g and azithromycin resistance in a Brazilian T. pallidum isolate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.