Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748369›Full record

ReviewCurrent medical science2024

A Review of Type 1 and Type 2 Intraductal Papillary Neoplasms of the Bile Duct.

Xia-Hui Huang, Tian-Xiang Chen, Hong-Liang Liu, Ming-Wen Huang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xia-Hui HuangDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Tian-Xiang ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Hong-Liang LiuDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Ming-Wen HuangDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China. xiongxi@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) is a heterogeneous disease similar to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. These lesions have been recognized as one of the three major precancerous lesions in the biliary tract since 2010. In 2018, Japanese and Korean pathologists reached a consensus, classifying IPNBs into type l and type 2 IPNBs. IPNBs are more prevalent in male patients in East Asia and are closely related to diseases such as cholelithiasis and schistosomiasis. From a molecular genetic perspective, IPNBs exhibit early genetic variations, and different molecular pathways may be involved in the tumorigenesis of type 1 and type 2 IPNBs. The histological subtypes of IPNBs include gastric, intestinal, pancreaticobiliary, or oncocytic subtypes, but type 1 IPNBs typically exhibit more regular and well-organized histological features than type 2 IPNBs and are more commonly found in the intrahepatic bile ducts with abundant mucin. Due to the rarity of these lesions and the absence of specific clinical and laboratory features, imaging is crucial for the preoperative diagnosis of IPNB, with local bile duct dilation and growth along the bile ducts being the main imaging features. Surgical resection remains the optimal treatment for IPNBs, but negative bile duct margins and the removal of lymph nodes in the hepatic hilum significantly improve the postoperative survival rates for patients with IPNBs.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsBile DuctsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCarcinoma, PapillaryHumansMaleintraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ductneoplasmsprecancerous tissueprognosissubclassification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.