Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748353›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2024

Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis in second-stage surgery in joint prosthesis infection treated with two-stage exchange. A multicenter case-control study.

Jose M Barbero Allende, Encarnación Fernández Antón, Joan Gómez-Junyent, Lluisa Sorlí Redó, Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo, Óscar Murillo Rubio, Marta Fernández Sampedro, Rosa Escudero-Sánchez, Manuel García Gutiérrez, Ma Eugenia Portillo and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jose M Barbero AllendeInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. j_m_barbero@yahoo.es.
Encarnación Fernández AntónDepartment of Biomedical Sciences (Pharmacology), Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Joan Gómez-JunyentOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Lluisa Sorlí RedóOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Dolors Rodríguez-PardoOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Óscar Murillo RubioOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Marta Fernández SampedroOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Rosa Escudero-SánchezOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Manuel García GutiérrezOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Ma Eugenia PortilloOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio SanchoInstitute of Healthcare Research of Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Alicia Rico NietoOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Laura Guio CarriónOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Alex Soriano ViladomiuInfectiuos Diseases Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura Morata RuizOsteoarticular Infections Study Group, Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GEIO-SEIMC), Madrid, Spain.
Francisco José de Abajo IglesiasClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAfter two-stage exchange due to prosthetic joint infection (PJI), the new prosthesis carries a high risk of reinfection (RePJI). There isn`t solid evidence regarding the antibiotic prophylaxis in 2nd-stage surgery. The objective of this study is to describe what antibiotic prophylaxis is used in this surgery and evaluate its impact on the risk of developing RePJI.

methodsRetrospective multicenter case-control study in Spanish hospitals. The study included cases of PJI treated with two-stage exchange and subsequently developed a new infection. For each case, two controls were included, matched by prosthesis location, center, and year of surgery. The prophylaxis regimens were grouped based on their antibacterial spectrum, and we calculated the association between the type of regimen and the development of RePJI using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for possible confounding factors.

resultsWe included 90 cases from 12 centers, which were compared with 172 controls. The most frequent causative microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis with 34 cases (37.8%). Staphylococci were responsible for 50 cases (55.6%), 32 of them (64%) methicillin-resistant. Gram-negative bacilli were involved in 30 cases (33.3%), the most common Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In total, 83 different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were used in 2nd-stage surgery, the most frequent a single preoperative dose of cefazolin (48 occasions; 18.3%); however, it was most common a combination of a glycopeptide and a beta-lactam with activity against Pseudomonas spp (99 cases, 25.2%). In the adjusted analysis, regimens that included antibiotics with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci AND Pseudomonas spp were associated with a significantly lower risk of RePJI (adjusted OR = 0.24; 95% IC: 0.09-0.65).

conclusionsThe lack of standardization in 2nd-satge surgery prophylaxis explains the wide diversity of regimens used in this procedure. The results suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis in this surgery should include an antibiotic with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci and Pseudomonas.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisProsthesis-Related InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansJoint ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpainAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prophylaxisProsthesis-related infectionsTwo-stage exchange

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.