Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748331›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2024

Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder: Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Applicability to Implantable Devices.

Una J Lee, Scott MacDiarmid, Catherine A Matthews, Emily Gillespie, Kenneth M Peters

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07576205 (Combine Effects of Paula Exercises and Tibial Nerve Stimulation on Incontinence, Pelvic Floor Muscles Strength, Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Stress Urinary Incontinence), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07576205 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Combine Effects of Paula Exercises and Tibial Nerve Stimulation on Incontinence, Pelvic Floor Muscles Strength, Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Stress Urinary Incontinence

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled52ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsPaula Exercises, Tibial Nerve Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. A First-In-Human Feasibility Study of a New Implantable Tibial Nerve Stimulator for Overactive Bladder Syndrome.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2025
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Una J LeeVirginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave C7-URO, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. una.lee@vmfh.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1128-5083
Scott MacDiarmidAlliance Urology Specialists, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Catherine A MatthewsWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Emily GillespieMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kenneth M PetersCorewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tibial nerve is an established target for neuromodulation in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) and its associated symptoms, including urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Technologies are currently available to deliver tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) through percutaneous devices or through implantable devices. The benefits and safety of percutaneous TNS have led to it as a guideline-recommended therapy. However, patient compliance is limited by the burden of weekly office visits and the need for maintenance treatments. Further, insurance often only covers a limited number of lifetime visits for percutaneous TNS. These factors and others have led to the development, study, and utilization of implantable TNS devices. Implantable TNS devices deliver the same therapeutic mechanism of action for nerve stimulation with a permanent implanted device that provides at-home stimulation rather than in-office therapy delivery. Additionally, there is an added potential for dynamic and patient-centered stimulation. There is a large body of high-quality evidence published for TNS, including numerous randomized controlled trials published on percutaneous TNS which have consistently demonstrated superior efficacy to sham and similar efficacy to that of anticholinergic medications. Percutaneous TNS also performs better than conservative therapy including pelvic floor muscle training. The percutaneous and implantable approaches deliver nerve stimulation to the same target nerve, using the same mechanism of action. Therefore, data from randomized trials of percutaneous TNS are informative for implantable TNS devices. At the time of this article's publication, at least two implantable TNS devices have received marketing authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The objective of this review is to discuss the mechanism of action for TNS and summarize the published literature from clinical trials of percutaneous TNS as a foundation of high-quality evidence for implantable devices targeting the tibial nerve.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicTibial NerveUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary Incontinence, UrgeElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHumansTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment OutcomeImplantable tibial nerve stimulation devicesNeurostimulationOveractive bladderPercutaneous tibial nerve stimulationTibial nerve stimulationUrge urinary incontinence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.