Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748286›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI reports2024

Trine Husby, Knut Johannessen, Erik Magnus Berntsen, Håkon Johansen, Guro Fanneløb Giskeødegård, Anna Karlberg, Unn-Merete Fagerli, Live Eikenes

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Trine Husby *Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway.
Knut Johannessen *Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway.
Erik Magnus BerntsenDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway.
Håkon JohansenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Guro Fanneløb GiskeødegårdDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Anna KarlbergDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway.
Unn-Merete FagerliDepartment of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Live EikenesDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway. live.eikenes@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3411-8317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis PET/MRI study compared contrast-enhanced MRI,

resultsAt baseline, seven ce-MRI detected lesions were also detected with

conclusions

Indexed as

18F-FDGMRI 18F-FACBCPCNSLPET

Identifiers

PMID38748286
PMCPMC10962628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.