Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748262›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2024

Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) predict poor survival in adenocarcinomas of the stomach and gastrooesophageal junction: a validation study.

Dita Ulase, Hans-Michael Behrens, Christoph Röcken

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. FOXP3Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dita UlaseDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Building U33, 24105, Kiel, Germany. dita.ulase@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8414-4399
Hans-Michael BehrensDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Building U33, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Christoph RöckenDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Building U33, 24105, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6989-8002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the presence of "Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas" (SARIFA) has been described as a promising adverse prognostic factor in gastric cancer. However, the validity of this approach still needs to be tested. The aim of this study was to independently assess the utility of the proposed method in a well-characterised cohort of primary resected adenocarcinomas of stomach and gastrooesophageal junction (n = 392). SARIFA status was analysed on routine slides of resection specimens. Cases were divided into SARIFA-positive and negative groups and analysed in relation to clinicopathological and survival data. SARIFA positivity was found in 15.1% (n = 59) cases and was significantly associated with Lauren phenotype (p < 0.001), pT (p = 0.001), pN (p = 0.018), UICC stage (p = 0.031), tumour budding (p = 0.002), overall survival (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (p < 0.001). SARIFA-positive tumours had a worse prognosis in the multivariate setting (HR = 1.847, 95% CI: 1.300-2.624, p = 0.001). SARIFA status is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer, in particular in locally advanced tumours.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophagogastric JunctionNeoplasm InvasivenessStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisGastric cancerHistopathologyInvasive marginPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID38748262
PMCPMC11415449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.