Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748256›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Machine learning algorithm predicts urethral stricture following transurethral prostate resection.

Emre Altıntaş, Ali Şahin, Huseyn Babayev, Murat Gül, Ali Furkan Batur, Mehmet Kaynar, Özcan Kılıç, Serdar Göktaş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emre AltıntaşFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Selcuk University, Tıp Fakültesi Alaeddin Keykubat Yerleşkesi Selçuklu, Konya, 42131, Turkey. dr.e.altintas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6797-3937
Ali ŞahinFaculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Huseyn BabayevFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Murat GülFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Selcuk University, Tıp Fakültesi Alaeddin Keykubat Yerleşkesi Selçuklu, Konya, 42131, Turkey.
Ali Furkan BaturFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Selcuk University, Tıp Fakültesi Alaeddin Keykubat Yerleşkesi Selçuklu, Konya, 42131, Turkey.
Mehmet KaynarFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Selcuk University, Tıp Fakültesi Alaeddin Keykubat Yerleşkesi Selçuklu, Konya, 42131, Turkey.
Özcan KılıçFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Selcuk University, Tıp Fakültesi Alaeddin Keykubat Yerleşkesi Selçuklu, Konya, 42131, Turkey.
Serdar GöktaşFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Selcuk University, Tıp Fakültesi Alaeddin Keykubat Yerleşkesi Selçuklu, Konya, 42131, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo predict the post transurethral prostate resection(TURP) urethral stricture probability by applying different machine learning algorithms using the data obtained from preoperative blood parameters.

methodsA retrospective analysis of data from patients who underwent bipolar-TURP encompassing patient characteristics, preoperative routine blood test outcomes, and post-surgery uroflowmetry were used to develop and educate machine learning models. Various metrics, such as F1 score, model accuracy, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, Youden Index, ROC AUC value, and confidence interval for each model, were used to assess the predictive performance of machine learning models for urethral stricture development.

resultsA total of 109 patients' data (55 patients without urethral stricture and 54 patients with urethral stricture) were included in the study after implementing strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The preoperative Platelet Distribution Width, Mean Platelet Volume, Plateletcrit, Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, and Prothrombin Time values were statistically meaningful between the two cohorts. After applying the data to the machine learning systems, the accuracy prediction scores for the diverse algorithms were as follows: decision trees (0.82), logistic regression (0.82), random forests (0.91), support vector machines (0.86), K-nearest neighbors (0.82), and naïve Bayes (0.77).

conclusionOur machine learning models' accuracy in predicting the post-TURP urethral stricture probability has demonstrated significant success. Exploring prospective studies that integrate supplementary variables has the potential to enhance the precision and accuracy of machine learning models, consequently progressing their ability to predict post-TURP urethral stricture risk.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsTransurethral Resection of ProstateUrethral StrictureAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesMachine learning,blood parametersTransurethral prostate resectionUrethral stricture

Identifiers

PMID38748256
PMCPMC11096196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.