Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38748242›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024

The modified Hardinge approach is not inferior to trochanteric flip osteotomy for Pipkin type IV femoral head fractures: a comparative study in 40 patients.

I-Jung Chen, Ying-Chao Chou, Po-Ju Lai, Yung-Heng Hsu, Yi-Hsun Yu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I-Jung ChenDivision of Orthopedic Traumatology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kweishan 333, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4536-648X
Ying-Chao ChouDivision of Orthopedic Traumatology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kweishan 333, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4790-1386
Po-Ju LaiDivision of Orthopedic Traumatology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kweishan 333, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2537-1902
Yung-Heng HsuDivision of Orthopedic Traumatology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kweishan 333, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-3212
Yi-Hsun YuDivision of Orthopedic Traumatology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kweishan 333, Taoyuan, Taiwan. alanyu1007@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-404X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the modified Hardinge approach and trochanteric flip osteotomy for the treatment of Pipkin type IV femoral head fractures.

methodsThis retrospective study included 40 patients who underwent surgical treatment for Pipkin type IV femoral head fractures between 2011 and 2020 and completed at least 1 year of follow-up. The clinical outcome of the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score and radiological outcomes, including the quality of the fracture reduction, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, posttraumatic osteoarthritis, and heterotopic ossification, were compared between the two groups. Conversion to total hip replacement was recorded as the main outcome measure, analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test.

resultsNineteen and 21 patients were treated using the modified Hardinge approach (Group A) and trochanteric flip osteotomy (Group B), respectively. The estimated surgical blood loss was significantly higher in Group B (500.00 ± 315.44 mL vs. 246.32 ± 141.35 mL; P = 0.002). Two patients in Group B complained of discomfort caused by the trochanteric screws and requested implant removal. Radiographic outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Clinical outcomes assessed using the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score 1 year after injury were nearly identical (P = 0.836). Four (21.1%) patients in Group A and three (14.3%) patients in Group B underwent conversion to total hip replacement during the follow-up period; the log-rank test showed no significant difference (P = 0.796).

conclusionsThe modified Hardinge approach resulted in reduced blood loss, with clinical and radiological outcomes similar to those of trochanteric osteotomy; thus, it is an acceptable alternative to trochanteric flip osteotomy.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalHip FracturesOsteotomyAdultAgedFemaleFemur HeadHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAcetabular fractureFemoral head fractureHardinge approachTrochanteric flip osteotomy

Identifiers

PMID38748242
PMCPMC11458743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.